Abstract
Purpose
To test the value of the nonaspiration, or capillary, biopsy technique by experimental comparison with the conventional fine-needle aspiration technique using various needle gauges and lengths.
Methods
On fresh hepatic and renal tissue from five autopsies, multiple biopsy specimens were taken with 20, 22, and 23-gauge Chiba needles of 5, 10, 15, and 20-cm length, using the aspiration technique and the capillary technique. The resultant specimens were graded on the basis of a grading scheme by a cytopathologist who was blinded to the biopsy technique.
Results
The capillary technique obtained less background blood or clot which could obscure diagnostic tissue, although not significantly different from the aspiration technique (p=0.2). However, for the amount of cellular material obtained, retention of appropriate architecture, and mean score, the capillary technique performed statistically worse than aspiration biopsy (p<0.01). In addition, with decreasing needle caliber (increasing needle gauge) and increasing length, the capillary biopsy was inferior to the aspiration biopsy.
Conclusion
The capillary biopsy technique is inferior to the aspiration technique according to our study. When the capillary technique is to be applied, preference should be given to larger caliber, shorter needles.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mair S, Dumbar F, Becker P, Plessis W (1989) Fine needle cytology—is aspiration suction necessary? A study of 100 masses in various sites. Acta Cytologica 33:809–813
Fagelman D, Chess Q (1990) Non-aspiration fine needle cytology of the liver: A new technique for obtaining diagnostic samples. AJR 155:1217–1219
Zajdela A, de Maublanc MA, Schlienger P, Haye C (1986) Cytologic diagnosis of orbital and periorbital palpable tumors using fine-needle sampling without aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 2:17–20
Santos JE, Leiman G (1988) Non-aspiration fine needle cytology: Application of a new technique to nodular thyroid disease. Acta Cytol 32:353–356
Akhtar M, Alt MA, Huq M, Faulkner C (1989) Fine needle biopsy: Comparison of cellular yield with and without aspiration. Diag Cytopathol 5:162–165
Zajdela A, Zillhardt P, Voillemot N (1987) Cytological diagnosis by fine needle sampling without aspiration. Cancer 59:1201–1205
Briffod M, Gentile A, Hébert H (1982) Cytopuncture in the follow-up of breast carcinoma. Acta Cytol 26:195–200
Hopper KH, Abendroth CS, Sturtz KW, Matthews YL, Shirk SF (1992) Fine needle aspiration (FNAB) for cytopathology. The utilization of syringe handles, automated guns, and the non-suction method. Radiology 185:819–824
Dixon JM, Lamb J, Anderson TJ (1983) Fine needle aspiration of the breast: Importance of the operator. (letter). Lancet 2:564
Kreula J, Bondestam S, Virkkunen P (1989) Sample size in fine needle aspiration biopsy. Br J Surg 76:1270–1272.
Kreula J (1990) Effect of sampling technique on specimen size in fine needle aspiration biopsy. Invest Radiol 25:1294–1299
Krebs TL, Dawson SL, Lee MJ, Saini S, Filomena CA, Mueller PR (1991) Aspiration versus non-aspiration fine needle biopsy technique: Which is better? Radiology 181(P):185
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hopper, K.D., Grenko, R.T., Fisher, A.I. et al. Capillary versus aspiration biopsy: Effect of needle size and length on the cytopathological specimen quality. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 19, 341–344 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02570187
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02570187