Abstract
A 58-year old hemianopsia patient was submitted to a two-fold neuropsychological training in order to enhance visual functions in the affected part of his visual field. At first, the visual field was measured perimetrically, to serve as a starting measurement with which after-measurements could be compared. Then, the first training was started: the border area between the intact and the defect visual field was being stimulated by small light spots. The training consisted of repetitive detection threshold measurements. After 27 one-hour sessions, the visual field was being measured again. The visual field appeared to have been enlarged 5 to 12 degrees in the direction of the affected hemifield and contrast-sensitivity thresholds to have been decreased almost at every point in the stimulus-array. Then, a second training started; an eye-movement training. Again, the border area, now shifted outwards, was stimulated. This time, the stimulus concerned a short presentation of light (<200 msec.) after which the subject, to the best of his abilities had to make an eye-movement to the perceived stimulus-site. Also, he had to categorize the quality of his perception as well as the direction in which the stimulus was thought to be perceived. After 30 sessions, the visual field appeared to have ‘grown’ just a little bit more, but this seems not to be a significant enlargement. More important, the number of detected stimuli in the supposed ‘blind’ area had increased, as had the accuracy of the localization of the stimuli. Preliminary results of the detection training of a second subject, also 58 years of age, are presented. Finally, planned actions are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Zihl J, v Cramon D. Restitution of visual function in patients with cerebral blindness. J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1979; 42: 312–322.
Zihl J. Recovery of visual functions in patients with cerebral blindness. Brain Res 1981; 44: 159–169.
Zihl J, v Cramon D. Visual field recovery from scotoma in patients with postgeniculate damage. Brain 1985; 108: 335–365.
Zihl J, v Cramon D. Visual field rehabilitation in the cortically blind? J Neurol Neurosurg Psych 1986; 49(8): 965–966.
Zihl J. Zur Behandlung von Patienten mit homonymen Gesichts- feldstörungen. Zeitschr Neuropsych Heft 1990; 2: 95–101.
Mestre DR et al. Perception of optical flow in cortical blindness a case report. Neuropsychologia 1992; 30(9): 783–795.
Meienberg O et al. Saccadic eye movement strategies in patients with homonymus hemianopia. Ann of Neurol 1981; 9: 537–544.
Weinberg J et al. Training sensory awareness and spatial organisation in people with RBD. Arch Phys Med and Rehab 1979; 60: 491–496.
Weinberg J et al. Training perceptual organisation deficits in non-neglecting RBD-stroke patients. J Clin Neuropsych 1982; 4(1): 59–75.
Gordon W A et al. Perceptual remediation in patients with RBD. Arch Phys Med and Rehab 1985; 66: 353–360.
Robinson DA. A method of measuring eye movement using a scleral search coil in a magnetic field. IEEE Trans Biomed Electr 1963; BME-40: 137–145.
Kasten E, Sabel BA. Visual field enlargement after computer training in brain damaged patients with homonymous deficits: an open pilot trial. Rest Neurology and NeuroScience 1995; 8: 113–127.
Bergsma DP, vd Wildt GJ. Vergroting van het visuele veld door neuropsychologische training bij een cliënt met homonymen hemianopsie. Visueel 1996; (1): 30–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Read at the 190th meeting of the Netherlands Ophthalmological Society, 1996
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Der Wildt, G.J., Bergsma, D.P. Visual field enlargement by neuropsychological training of a hemianopsia patient. Doc Ophthalmol 93, 277–292 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02569067
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02569067