Summary
The pike-perch,Stizostedion lucioperca, uses both suction and grasping during feeding. Type, size, and position of prey and predator determine the movement of catching. This is concluded from simultaneous motion analysis, electromyography, and the record of pressures inside the buccopharyngeal cavity during feeding. The EMG incorporates 24 muscles of the head, including the branchial basket and the anterior body musculature.
When the pike-perch begins to feed acceleration and expansion of the head parts determine the negative buccopharyngeal pressure and therefore the suction force applied to different preys. Not the head muscles, but the epaxial and hypaxial body musculatures provide the main force for the rapid expansion of the head through movements of the neurocranium, pectoral girdle, and hyoid arch. Despite the lack of a true neck, the pike-perch is able to move its neurocranium in all directions to aim the suction force.
The experiments revealed that ventral and lateral movements aid in the ingestion of a big prey after it has been grasped with the teeth. The head muscles are active as regulators of the opening movements and in the closing movements. Variable overlaps of ab- and adductor activity show that their contraction patterns are interdependent. Variations in the recorded pressures can be related largely to a series of EMGs showing different starting moments of adductor contraction. In this progressive series two patterns were distinguished, and their accompanying movements were compared and related to the type of prey. According to the feeding behavior and morphology, the pike-perch is classified as a rapacious predator. Comparison with some other voracious fishes shows that besides the total length of the lower jaw and the dentigerous area, the construction and dentition of the upper jaws and the anterior suspensorial and neurocranial parts are also important features of this ecological type. However it appears that the fishes selected for this comparison use suction rather than the teeth as the main means of catching the smaller, but commonly eaten prey. The teeth prevent escape after capture by sucking and they increase the maximum prey size that can be caught. In this group, the head ofStizostedion appears to be comparatively well adapted to sucking with grasping adaptations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- abd.:
-
abductor
- add.:
-
adductor
- ant.:
-
anterior
- apon.:
-
aponeurotically
- art.:
-
articulare
- A1t:
-
tendon of m. add. mand. 1 (A1)
- b. hyal.:
-
basihyale
- branch, membr.:
-
branchiostegal membrane
- br.:
-
branchiostegal rays
- c. branch:
-
ceratobranchiale
- c. hyal.:
-
ceratohyale
- circ. orb.:
-
circumorbital bones
- cl.:
-
cleithrum
- conn, tissue:
-
connective tissue
- cop.:
-
copula
- cor.:
-
coracoideum
- coronomeck:
-
coronomeckelian bone
- dent.:
-
dentale
- depr.:
-
depressor
- dors.:
-
dorsalis
- ect. pt.:
-
ectopterygoideum
- e. hyal.:
-
epihyale
- ent. pt.:
-
entopterygoideum
- exp.:
-
experiment
- ext.:
-
externus
- ex. scap.:
-
extrascapulare
- fr.:
-
frontale
- gl. hyal.:
-
glossohyale
- h. branch:
-
hypobranchiale
- h. hyal.:
-
hypohyale
- hyom.:
-
hyomandibulare
- i. hyal.:
-
interhyale
- inf.:
-
inferior
- int.:
-
internus
- int. op.:
-
interoperculum
- l:
-
left
- lacr.:
-
lacrimale
- lat.:
-
lateral
- lat. ethm.:
-
lateral ethmoideum
- lev.:
-
levator
- lig.:
-
ligamentum
- l:
-
jaw lower jaw
- mand.:
-
mandibula
- max.:
-
maxillare
- Meck.:
-
cart. Meckel's cartilage
- med.:
-
medialis
- mesethm.:
-
mesethmoid
- m.:
-
musculus
- m. pt.:
-
metapterygoideum
- musc.:
-
musculature
- m. add. arc. pal.:
-
m. adductor arcus palatini
- m. add. hyomand.:
-
m. adductor hyomandibulae
- m. add. mand.:
-
m. adductor mandibulae
- m. add. operc.:
-
m. adductor operculi
- m. dil. operc.:
-
m. dilatator operculi
- m. geniohy.:
-
m. geniohyoideus
- m. hyohy.:
-
m. hyohyoideus
- m. intermand.:
-
m. intermandibularis
- m. lev. arc. branch:
-
m. levator arcus branchialis
- m. lev. arc. pal.:
-
m. levator arcus palatini
- m. lev. operc.:
-
m. levator operculi
- m. obl.:
-
m. obliquus
- m. phar. branch:
-
m. pharyngobranchialis
- m. phar. cl.:
-
m. pharyngocleithralis
- m. phar. hy.:
-
m. pharyngohyalis
- m. protr. pect.:
-
m. protractor pectoralis
- m. retr. dors.:
-
m. retractor dorsalis
- m. sternohy.:
-
m. sternohyoideus
- m. trans.:
-
m. transversus
- m. trap.:
-
m. trapezius
- myos.:
-
myoseptum
- nas.:
-
nasale
- neur.:
-
neurocranium
- op.:
-
operculum
- pal.:
-
palatinum
- pect. girdle.:
-
pectoral girdle
- post.:
-
posterior
- premax.:
-
premaxillare
- preop.:
-
preoperculum
- proc. retroart.:
-
processus retroarticularis
- rotat.:
-
rotation
- protr.:
-
protractor
- p. sph.:
-
parasphenoid
- p. temp.:
-
posttemporal
- quadr.:
-
quadratum
- r.:
-
right
- retr.:
-
retractor
- scap.:
-
scapulare
- s. cl.:
-
supracleithrum
- s. occ.:
-
supraoccipitale
- sphen.:
-
sphenoticum
- subop.:
-
suboperculum
- sup.:
-
superior
- susp.:
-
Suspensorium
- symph. cl.:
-
symphysis cleithri
- sympl.:
-
symplecticum
- u. hyal.:
-
urohyale
- up. jaws.:
-
upper jaws
- ventr.:
-
ventralis
- vom.:
-
vomer
References
Allan, J.L., Harman, P.D.: Control of pH in MS-222 anesthetic solutions. Progr. Fish Culturist32, 100 (1970)
Anker, G.Ch.: Morphology and kinetics of the head of the stickleback,Gasterosteus aculeatus. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond.32, 311–416 (1974)
Ballintijn, C.M., Roberts, J.L.: Neural control and proprioceptive load matching in reflex respiratory movements of fishes. Fed. Proc.35, 1983–1991 (1976)
Berinkey, L.: The osteology ofLucioperca lucioperca andLucioperca volgensis. Ann. Hist. Nat. Mus. Nat. Hungarici, Ser. nova IX, 313–327 (1958)
Deelder, C.L., Willemsen, J.: Synopsis of biological data on pike-perchLucioperca lucioperca (Linnaeus 1758) FAO Fish Synops.28, 1–52 (1964)
Dullemeyer, P.: Concepts and approaches in animal morphology. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorkum and Comp. N.V. 1974
Elshoud-Oldenhave, M.J.W., Osse, J.W.M.: Functional morphology of the feeding system in theRuff-Gymnocephalus cernua (1758)-(Teleostei, Percidae). J. Morph.150, 399–422 (1976)
Gans, C.: Functional components versus mechanical units in descriptive morphology. J. Morph.128, 365–368 (1969)
Hofer, H.: Zur Kenntnis der Suspensionsformen des Kieferbogens und der Zusammenhänge mit dem Bau des knöchernen Gaumens und mit der Kinetik des Schädels bei den Knochenfischen. Zool. Jb. Abt. Anat.69, 321 (1945)
Joppien, H.: Vergleichend-anatomische und funktionsanalytische Untersuchungen an den Kiefer- und Kiemenapparaten der räuberischen KnochenfischeAphanopus undMerluccius. Zool. Beitr., N.F.16, 263–387 (1970)
Kampf, W.D.: Vergleichende funktionsmorphologische Untersuchungen an den Viscerocranien einiger räuberisch lebender Knochenfische. Zool. Beitr., N.F.6, 391–496 (1961)
Liem, K.P.: Comparative functional anatomy of the Nandidae (Pisces: Teleostei) Fieldiana: Zool.56, 7–166 (1970)
Maldonado, H.: The control of attack byOctopus. Z. Vergl. Physiol.47, 656–674 (1964)
Messenger, J.B.: The visual attack of the cuttlefish,Sepia officinalis. Anim. Behav.16, 342–357 (1968)
Mittelstaedt, H.: Prey capture in mantids. In: Recent advances in invertebrate physiology. (B.T. Scheer ed.), pp. 51–71. Eugene: Univ. of Oregon Publ 1957
Neuhaus, E.: Studien über das Stettiner Haff und seine Nebengewässer. Z. f. Fish.32, 715–720 (1934)
Nyberg, D.W.: Prey capture in the largemouth bass. Am. Midl. Naturalist.86, 128–144 (1971)
Osse, J.W.M.: Functional anatomy of the head of the perch (Perca fluviatilis, L.); an electromyographic study. Neth. J. Zool.19, 289–392 (1969)
Osse, J.W.M., Oldenhave, M., van Schie, B.: A new method for insertion of wire electrodes in electromyography. Electromyography12, 59–62 (1972)
Pihu, E., Pihu, E.: About the ways of swallowing the prey by predatory fish. Eesti NSV Tead. Akad. Toim. 20. Koide Biol.2, 127–132 (1971) (in Russian, English summary)
Pugliesi, E.: Il cranio dellaLucioperca sandra Cuv. Morfologia e studi comparativi. Atti Soc. Ital. Sci. Natur. Mus. Civ. Stör. Natur. Milano49, 278–296 (1910)
Schaeffer, B., Rosen, D.E.: Major adaptive levels in the evolution of the Actinopterygian feeding mechanism. Am. Zoologist1, 187–204 (1961)
Tchernavin, V.V.: On the mechanical working of the head in bony fishes. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond.118, 129–143 (1948)
Willémsen, J.: Population dynamics of percids in Lake IJssel and some smaller lakes in the Netherlands. J. Fish. Res. Board Can.34, 1710–1719 (1977)
Willemsen, J.: Food and growth of pike-perch in Holland. Proc. Fourth Britt. Coarse Fish Conf. (1969)
Winterbottom, R.: A descriptive synonymy of the striated muscles of the Teleostei. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sc. Philadelphia,125 (12) 225–317 (1974)
Zweers, G.A.: Structure, movement, and myography of the feeding apparatus of the mallard, (Anas platyrhynchos, L.) Neth. J. of Zool.24 (4), 323–467 (1974)
Zyznar, E.S., Ali, M.A.: An interpretative study of the organisation of the visual cells and the tapetum lucidum ofStizostedion. Can. J. of Zool.53 (2) 180–196 (1975)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elshoud-Oldenhave, M.J.W. Prey capture in the pike-perch,Stizostedion lucioperca (teleostei, percidae): A structural and functional analysis. Zoomorphologie 93, 1–32 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02568672
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02568672