Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy as the first screening procedure for colorectal neoplasms in an asymptomatic population

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

As the first screening for colorectal neoplasms, a total of 2243 examinations by fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy (FS) were performed on 1573 asymptomatic patients. One hundred seventy neoplasms were found in 134 patients (6 percent of total examinations), including nine adenocarcinomas (0.4 percent). A flat, intramucosal cancer and a small, 5-mm cancer detected by FS could not be demonstrated by barium enema examination. On further investigation, additional adenomas were identified in the proximal colon in 22 percent of patients in whom neoplasms had first been detected by FS and in only 4.4 percent of those in whom FS findings were negative but other criteria were positive. It is concluded that FS is the procedure of choice for the first screening of asymptomatic patients, not only because it enables detection of flat and small lesions within its observation range, but also because it could lead to detection of proximal neoplasms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Statistics and Information Department, Minister's Secretariat, Ministry of Health and Welfare. Vital Statistics 1985 Japan. 1985;1:248–63.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Winawer SJ, Sherlock P. Surveillance for colorectal cancer in average-risk patients, familial high-risk groups, and patients with adenomas. Cancer 1982;50:2609–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohlman TW, Katon RM, Lipsutz GR, McCool MF, Smith FW, Melnyk CS. Fiberoptic pansigmoidoscopy: an evaluation and comparison with rigid sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 1977; 72:644–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marks G, Boggs HW, Castro AF, Gathright JB, Ray JE, Salvati E. Sigmoidoscopic examinations with rigid and flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopes in the surgeon's office: a comparative prospective study of effectiveness in 1,012 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1979; 22:162–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Winnan G, Berci G, Panish J, Talbot TM, Overholt BF, McCallum RW. Superiority of the flexible to the rigid sigmoidoscope in routine proctosigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 1980;302:1011–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wherry DC. Screening for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic patients using flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:521–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lipshutz GR, Katon RM, McCool MF, et al. Flexible sigmoidoscopy as a screening procedure for neoplasia of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979;148:19–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yarborough G, Waisbren BA. The benefits of systematic fiberoptic flexible sigmoidoscopy. Arch Intern Med 1985;145:95–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vellacott KD, Hardcastle JD. Comparison of rigid and flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy with double contrast barium enemas. Br J Surg 1982;69:399–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coller JA, Corman ML, Veidenheimer MC. Colonic polypoid disease: need for total colonsocopy. Am J Surg 1976;131:490–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T, et al. Small “flat adenoma” of the large bowel with special reference to its clinicopathologic features. Dis Colon Rectum 1985;28:847–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shamsuddin AM, Kato Y, Kuinishima N, Sugano H, Trump BF. Carcinoma in situ in nonpolypoid mucosa of large intestine: report of a case with significance in strategies for early detection. Cancer 1985;56:2849–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colon polyps: an analysis of 7,000 polyps endoscopically removed. Ann Surg 1979;190:679–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Appel MF. Distribution of malignant polyps in the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:427–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Morgenstern L, Lee SE. Spatial distribution of colon carcinoma. Arch Surg 1978;113:1142–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mamazza J, Gordon PH. The changing distribution of large intestinal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:558–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon JB. Occult blood screening for colorectal carcinoma: a critical review. Gastroenterology 1985;88:820–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Letsou G, Ballantyne GH, Zdon MJ, Zucker KA, Modlin IM. Screening for colorectal neoplasms: a comparison of the fecal occult blood test and endoscopic examination. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:839–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahlquist DA, McGill DB, Schwartz S, Taylor WF, Owen RA. Fecal blood levels in health and disease: a study using HemoQuant. N Engl J Med 1985;312:1422–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Songster CL, Barrows GH, Jarrett DD. Immunochemical detection of fecal occult blood—the fecal smear punch-disc test: a new non-invasive screening test for colorectal cancer. Cancer 1980; 45:1099–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gryska PV, Cohen AM. Screening asymptomatic patients at high risk for colon cancer with full colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:18–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morson BC, Bussey HJ. Magnitude of risk for cancer in patients with colorectal adenomas. Br J Surg 1985;72:S23–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Warden MJ, Petrelli NJ, Herrera L, Mittelman A. The role of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy in screening for colorectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;30:52–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tripp MR, Morgan TR, Sampliner RE, Kogan FJ, Protell RL, Earnest DL. Synchronous neoplasm in patient with diminutive colorectal adenomas. Cancer 1987;60:1599–603.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Church JM, Fazio VW, Jones IT. Small colorectal polyps—are they worth treating? Dis Colon Rectum 1988;31:50–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Shida, H., Yamamoto, T. Fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy as the first screening procedure for colorectal neoplasms in an asymptomatic population. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 404–408 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563693

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02563693

Key words

Navigation