Abstract
The purpose of the present study was to pre- and postoperatively evaluate the anal sphincter after coloanal anastomosis in 20 patients with carcinoma of the rectum at 5.5 to 8 cm from the anal verge. The 20 patients matched age and sex with the controlled subjects. Of the 20 patients, 17 with normal preoperative manometric studies when compared with control subjects underwent a coloanal anastomosis as described by Castrini, and three patients with preoperative incontinence underwent abdominoperineal resection. Manometric studies preoperatively, and postoperatively at three and 12 months, indicated a statistically significant decrease in squeezing pressure, and rectal compliance at three months that almost normalized by 12 months. The rectal compliance correlated with the number of bowel movements per day at three months (four to five per day) and at 12 months (two to three per day). The rectoanal reflex and length of pressure zone have remained unchanged. Results seem to indicate that anal continence can be preserved after coloanal anastomosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bacon HE. Evolution of sphincter muscle preservation and reestablishment of continuity in the operative treatment of rectal and sigmoidal cancer. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1945;81:113–27..
D'Allaines F. Die chirurgische behandlung des rektumkarzinomas. Liepzig: Barth, 1956.
Kraske P. Zur extirpation hochsitzender mast-darmkrebs. Verh Dtsch Ges Chir 1885;14:64.
Mason AY. Trans-sphincteric surgery of the rectum. Progr Surg 1974;13:66–97.
Parks AG. Transanal technique in low rectal anastomosis. Proc R Soc Med 1972;65:975–6.
Devereux DF, Deckers PJ. Contributions of pathologic margins and Dukes' stage to local recurrence in colorectal carcinoma. Am J Surg 1985;149:323–6.
Lane RH, Parks AG. Function of the anal sphincter following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1977;64:596–9.
Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and physiology of defecation. IX. Single loop continence: a new theory of the mechanism of anal continence. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:37–43.
Shafik A. A new concept of the anatomy of the anal sphincter mechanism and the physiology of defecation. XII. Anorectal mobilization—a new surgical access to rectal lesions: preliminary report. Am J Surg 1981;142:629–35.
Castrini G, Pappalardo G, Mobarhan S. A new technique for ileoanal and coloanal anastomosis. Surgery 1985;97:111–6.
Pedersen IK, Hint K, Olsen J, Christiansen J, Jensen P, Mortensen PE. Anorectal function after low anterior resection for carcinoma. Ann Surg 1986;204:133–5.
Heppell J, Kelly KA, Phillips SF, Beart RW, Telander RL, Perrault J. Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1982;195:435–43.
Suzuki H, Matsumoto K, Amano S, Fujioka M, Honzumi M. Anorectal pressure and rectal compliance after low anterior resection. Br J Surg 1980;67:655–7.
Cortesini C. Anorectal reflex following sphincter-saving operations. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:320–6.
Iwai N, Hashimoto K, Yamane T, et al. Physiologic status of the anorectum following sphincter-saving resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:652–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Pappalardo, G., Toccaceli, S., Dionisio, P. et al. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation by manometric study of the anal sphincter after coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 31, 119–122 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562642
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02562642