Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The remaining colon after radical surgery for colorectal cancer

The first three years of a prospective study

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

This study investigates the possible gain and limitation by performing colonoscopy and double-contrast enema immediately after, and every six months after, radical surgery for colorectal cancer. It was possible to perform a complete colonoscopy within three months of surgery in 80 per cent of the 239 patients and at the follow-up time in 90 per cent. Incompleteness was related to insufficient bowel preparation, narrow anastomosis, and long transverse colon. Five patients had synchronous cancers, and 64 had adenomas at the time of surgery. The risk of recurrent adenomas in the latter was higher (17/64) than in those without adenomas (15/175). The adenomas were located above the rectum in 57 of 80 patients who had polypectomy. Four patients with metachronous cancer and one of five patients with local recurrence had another radical operation, while this was possible in none of 40 patients with recurrence diagnosed by other means than colonoscopy and enema. Radical colorectal surgery should be followed by colonoscopy and double-contrast enema, but how often and for how long remains to be established.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schottenfeld D, Berg JW, Vitsky B. Incidence of multiple primary cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1969;43:77–86.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kronborg O. Polyps of the colon and rectum: approach to prophylaxis in colorectal cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1980;15:1–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbertsen VA. Proctosigmoidoscopy and polypectomy in reducing the incidence of rectal cancer. Cancer 1974;34:936–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kronborg O, Hage E, Deichgraeber E. The clean colon: a prospective partly randomized study of the effectiveness of repeated examinations of the colon after polypectomy and radical surgery for cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 1981;16:879–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vassilopoulus PP, Yoon JM, Ledesma EJ, Mittelman A. Treatment of recurrence of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum at the anastomotic site. Surg Genecol Obstet 1981;152:777–80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balslev I, Pedersen M, Teglbjaerg PSet al. Postoperative radiotherapy in rectosigmoid cancer Dukes B and C—interim report from a randomized multicentre study. Br J Cancer 1982;46:551–556.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Welin S, Welin G. The double contrast examination of the colon: experiences with the Welin modification. Stuttgart: Georg Thieme, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frank B, Zeabart LE, Brady PG. Colonoscopic evaluation following partial colon resection for adenocarcinoma (abstr.) Am J Gastroenterol 1979;72:335.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Appel MF. Distribution of malignant polyps in the colon. Gastrointest Endosc 1981;27:119.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rittenhouse MC, Copeland EM. Carcinoma in situ of the distal part of the colon and of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1978; 146:225–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Henry LG, Condon RE, Schulte WJ, Aprahamian C, DeCosse JJ. Risk of recurrence of colon polyps. Ann Surg 1975;182:511–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ekman C, Gustavson J, Henning A. Value of a follow-up study of recurrent carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1977;145:895–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Cochrane JPS, Williams JT, Faber RG, Slack WW. Value of out-patient follow-up after curative surgery for carcinoma of the large bowel. Br Med J 1980;1:593–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Winawer SJ, Sherlock P. Approach to screening and diagnosis in colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 1976;3:387–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Polk HC, Spratt JS. Recurrent colorectal carcinoma: detection, treatment, and other considerations. Surgery 1971;69:9–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Welch JP, Donaldson GA. Detection and treatment of recurrent cancer of the colon and rectum. Am J Surg 1978;135:505–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Flick AL. Appearance and growth of colon neoplasms in less than two years: nine cases (abstr.) Gastroenterology 1978;74:1035.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shindo K. Recurrence of carcinoma of the large intestine. Am J Proctol 1974;25:80–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Heald RJ, Lockhart-Mummery HE. The lesion of the second cancer of the large bowel. Br J Surg 1972;59:16–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Muto T, Bussey HJR, Morson BC. The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 1975;36:2251–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 1979;190:679–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Koppel M, Bailar JC III, Weakley FL, Shimkin MB. Incidence of cancer in the colon and rectum among polyp-free patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1962;5:349–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kronborg, O., Hage, E. & Deichgraeber, E. The remaining colon after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 26, 172–176 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02560165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02560165

Key words

Navigation