Skip to main content
Log in

Colocolostomy and coloproctostomy utilizing the circular intraluminal stapling devices

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Coloproctostomy or colocolostomy by peranal insertion of a circular stapling device was performed on 265 patients between January 1978, and June 1981. A low anterior resection was performed in 174 patients. Stapler-related technical complications occurred in 52 patients (20 per cent). Complementary transverse colostomies were performed in 11 patients, of which seven were performed on the first 30 patients. Intraoperative complications occurred in 18 patients (7 per cent). Twenty-six major postoperative complications occurred (10 per cent), and clinical anastomotic leaks occurred in eight patients (3 per cent). Four postoperative deaths occurred (1.5 per cent). This study concludes that (1)coloproctostomy or colocolostomy can be safely performed by transanal insertion of a circular stapling device, (2) these instruments allow a sphincter-preserving procedure to be performed for lesions in the low and midrectum (5 to 10 cm from the anal verge) with an acceptable early morbidity and mortality, and (3) the majority of stapler-related technical complications can be managed without protecting colostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goligher JC. Use of circular stapling gun with per anal insertion of anorectal purse-string suture for construction of very low colorectal or colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1979; 66:501–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fain SN, Patin S, Morgenstern L. Use of a mechanical suturing apparatus in low colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1975; 110:1079–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goligher JC, Lee PW, Lintott DJ. Experience with the Russian model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979; 148:517–24.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Adloff M, Arnaud JP, Beehary S. Stapled vs sutured colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1980; 115:1436–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kirkegaard P, Christiansen J, Hjortrup A. Anterior resection for midrectal cancer with the EEA stapling instrument. Am J Surg 1980; 140:312–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shahinian TK, Bowel JR, Dorman BA, Soderberg CH, Thompson WR. Experience with the EEA stapling device. Am J Surg 1980; 139:549–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stoller JL, Dowell AJ, Atkinson KG. Colorectal anastomosis by transanal end-to-end stapling. Can J Surg 1980; 23:461–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Beart RW Jr, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1981; 141:143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Francisco, California, May 2 to 6, 1982.

About this article

Cite this article

Kennedy, H.L., Rothenberger, D.A., Goldberg, S.M. et al. Colocolostomy and coloproctostomy utilizing the circular intraluminal stapling devices. Dis Colon Rectum 26, 145–148 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02560155

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02560155

Key Words

Navigation