Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating bilingual teaching materials —Relevant for science?

  • Section 2: Studies in Curriculum Development and Evaluation
  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ATKIN, M.J. “Research Styles in Science Education”,Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1967–68,5 (4): 338–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BALKAN, L.Les Effets du bilinguisme Francais—Anglais Sur des Aptitudes Intellectuelles, Bruxelles: AIMAV, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  • BERNSTEIN, B. “A Critique of the Concept of Compensatory Education” in Rubinstein, D. and Stoneman, C., Editors,Education for Democracy, Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970, pp. 110–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • CLYNE, M. “Language Contact and Language Ecology in Australia”, paper presented at the Third Annual Language Teaching Conference, La Trobe University, May 3, 1974 (to be published in proceedings).

  • FLESCH, R.,The Art of Readable Writing, New York: Harper and Brothers, 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  • FRASER, B.J. “A Test of Enquiry Skills”, Tisher, R.D., Editor,Science Education: Research 1973, Brisbane: Australian Science Education Research Association, 1973, pp. 77–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAMILTON, D., Editor,Evaluation Instruments for Bilingual Education, Austin: Dissemination Center for Bilingual Bicultural Education, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • HAUGEN, E., in Andersson, T. and Boyer, M.Bilingual Schooling in the United States, 1, Austin: Southwest Education Development Laboratory, 1970, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • HURD, P.,New Directions in Teaching Secondary School Science, Chicago: Rand MacNally, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  • KERR, J.F., “The Problem of Curriculum Reform”,Changing the Curriculum, Kerr, J.F., Editor, London: London University Press, 1968, pp. 13–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • LIEDTKE, W.W. and NELSON, L.D. “Concept Formation and Bilingualism”,Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1968,14 (4): 225–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDONALD, B. “The Evaluation of the Humanities Curriculum Project: A Holistic Approach”,Theory into Practice (Regeneration of the Humanities), 1971,10 (3): 163–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACKLER, B. and GIDDINGS, M.G. “Cultural Deprivation: A Study of Mythology”.Teachers' College Record, April, 1965, pp. 608–613.

  • MACNAMARA, J. “The Effects of Instruction in a Weaker Language”,Journal of Social Issues, 1967,23 (2): 121–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MACNAMARA, J. “An Analytic Comparision of Reading in Two Languages”,The Irish Journal of Education, (ii), 1968,1: 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • MUSGROVE, F. “Curriculum Objectives”,Journal of Curriculum Studies, 1968–69,1, (1): 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEAL, E. and LAMBERT, W.E., “The relations of bilingualism to intelligence”,Psychological Monographs, 1962,76 (27): 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • RADO, M.Bilingual Education with Special Reference to the Multilingual Centre Research Project, paper presented at the National Seminar on Migrants and their Communication Needs, Monash University, August 21–25, 1972.

  • RADO, M.The Implications of Bilingualism, paper presented at the Third Annual Language Teaching Conference, La Trobe University, May 3, 1974 (to be published in proceedings).

  • RADO, M. “Language in Education: How, a Corollary to ‘For What?’”, inThe South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 1973,1 (2): 39–49.

  • RICHARDSON, M.W.An Evaluation of Certain Aspects of the Academic Achievement of Elementary Pupils in a Bilingual Program”, D. Ed. thesis Florida: Coral Gables, January, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCRIVEN, M. “The Methodology of Evaluation” inPerspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation 1, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967, pp. 40–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • STENHOUSE, L. “Some Limitations of the Use of Objectives in Curriculum Research and Planning”,Paedagogica Europaea: The Changing School Curriculum, VI, Eggleston, S.J., Editor, Braunschweig: Georg Westermann Verlag, 1970–71, pp. 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • STENHOUSE, L. “Handling Controversial Issues in the Classroom”,Education Canada, December 1969, pp. 13–21.

  • WALKER, D.F. “What Curriculum Research?” inJournal of Curriculum Studies, 1973,5 (1), 58–72.

  • WEINREICH, U., MACKEY, W.E., BROOKS, N.H. in Andersson, T. and Boyer, M.Bilingual Schooling in the United States 1, Austin: South West Educational Development Laboratory, 1970, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • WHITE, J.P. “The Concept of Curriculum Evaluation” inJournal of Curriculum Studies, 1971,3 (2): 101–112.

Download references

Authors
  1. Clive B. Kings
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kings, C.B. Evaluating bilingual teaching materials —Relevant for science?. Research in Science Education 4, 89–95 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558582

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558582

Keywords

Search

Navigation