Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of a formative evaluation model for astep

  • Section 2: Studies in Curriculum Development and Evaluation
  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • HAYSOM, J.T. and SUTTON, C.R. “Motivation: A neglected Component in Models for Curriculum Improvement”,Curriculum Theory Network, 1973. (In Press).

  • MACKAY, L.D. “A Proposal for the Formative Evaluation of ASTEP Materials.” Mimeographed Report, ASTEP, Canberra, A.C.T., 1973 (a).

    Google Scholar 

  • MACKAY, L.D. “ASTEP Interim Research Report No. 1/73.” Mimeographed Report, ASTEP, Canberra, A.C.T., 1973 (b).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION PROJECT.Theory into Practice, McGraw Hill, Berkshire, U.K., 1974. (In Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • SCRIVEN, M. “The Methodology of Evaluation”,Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation. New York; Rand McNally & Co., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Lindsay D. Mackay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeff R. Northfield
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mackay, L.D., Northfield, J.R. The use of a formative evaluation model for astep. Research in Science Education 4, 65–75 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558579

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558579

Keywords

Search

Navigation