Skip to main content
Log in

Self instruction using microteaching and videotape feedback during an in-service education course for teachers of harvard project physics

  • Micro-teaching and Interaction Studies
  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Allen, D.W. and Ryan, K.A. (1969).Microteaching, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D.C. (1969).Microteaching and the Technical Skills Approach to Teacher Training. Technical Report No. 8, Standford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.

  • Borg, W.R.et al. (1968a).The Minicourse: Rationale and Uses in the Inservice Education of Teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

  • Borg, W.R.et al. (1968b).The Minicourse: Changing Teacher Behaviour Through Microteaching, Unpublished Manuscript, Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.

  • Clause, K.E. (1969).Effects of Modeling and Feedback Variables on Questioning Skills. Technical Report No. 6, Stanford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.

  • Davis, O.L. and Tinsley, D.C. (1967). “Cognitive Objectives Revealed by Classroom Questions Asked by Social Studies Student Teachers”. In Hyman, Ronald T. (ed.), (1968),Teaching: Vantage Points for Study, Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Thomas P.A. (1969). “A Category System for Teacher Behaviours”,American Biology Teacher, 31, 221–26, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furst, Norma and Honigman, Fred. K. (1969).A Study of Pupil-Teacher Interaction in Experimental Communications Courses Compared with Traditional Junior High School Classes. Paper presented to the American Educational Research Association, Philadelphia, Temple University, College of Education, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

  • Gallagher, James J. (1966).Teacher Variation in Concept Presentation in BSCS Curriculum Program. Urbana, Institute for Research on Conceptional Children, Univ. of Ill., cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, James J. (1968).Analyses of Teacher Classroom Strategies Associated with Student Cognitive and Affective Performance, Cooperative Research Project No. 3325, (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Albert J. and Serwer, B. (1966).Comparison of Reading Approaches in First Grade Teaching with Disadvantaged Children. Cooperative Research Project No. 2677, New York: City Univ. of New York, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Albert J.et al. (1968).A Continuation of the CRAFT Project: Comparing Reading Approaches with Disadvantaged Negro Children in Primary Grades, Cooperative Research Project No. 5-0570-2-12-1. New York: Division of Teacher Education of the City Univ. of New York, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res. 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays, William Lee (1963).Statistics for Psychologists, pp. 462–489, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, John and Ober, Richard (1967). “The Effects of Training in Interaction Analyses on the Verbal Teaching Behaviour of Pre-Service Teachers,” InInteraction Analysis: Theory Research and Application, Amidon and Hough (eds.) Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Elizabeth (1969). “Talking in First Grade Classrooms”,Urban Review, 4, 39–43, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40. No. 2, 279–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Paul de H. (1966). “Teacher Preparation in Biology: Programs, Plans, Progress”,Newsletter, 28, B.S.C.S.

  • Kirk, Jeffrey (1967). “Elementary School Student Teachers and Interaction Analyses”, InInteraction Analysis: Theory Research and Application, Amidon and Hough (eds.), Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koran, J.J. (1969). “Two paradigms for the Training of Science Teachers using Videotape Technology and Simulated Conditions”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 6, No. 1, 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, F.J. and Allen, D.W. (1967).Training Effects of Feedback and Modeling Procedures on Teaching Performance. Technical Report No. 3, Stanford Centre for Research and Development in Teaching.

  • Orme, M.E.J. (1966).The Effects of Modeling and Feedback Variables on the Acquisition of a Complex Teaching Strategy. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Ann Arbor, Michigan: University Microfilms, No. 67-4417.

  • Parakh, Jal S. (1967). “A Study of Teacher-Pupil Interaction in High School Biology Classes: Part II. Description and Analysis”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 5, 183–92, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parakh, Jal S. (1968). “A Study of Teacher-Pupil Interaction in BSCS Yellow Version Biology Classes”,American Biology Teacher, 30, 841–48, cited by Rosenshine, Barak (1970), “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkes, Victor A. (1967). “Junior High School Teacher Preparation, Teacher Behaviours, and Student Achievement”, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University.

  • Rosenshine, Barak (1969). “Teaching Behaviours Related to Pupil Achievement”,Classroom Interaction Newsletter, 5, No. 1, 4–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenshine, Barak (1970). “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction”,Rev. of Educ. Res., 40, No. 2, 279–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thile, C. L. (1954). “Fostering Discovery with Children”,Arithmetic Teacher, 6, February.

  • Wilson, John H. (1969). “The ‘New’ Science Teachers are asking More and Better Questions”,J. of Res. in Science Teaching, 6, No. 1, 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, B.J. (1962).Statistical Principles in Experimental Design, p. 208, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rentoul, J. Self instruction using microteaching and videotape feedback during an in-service education course for teachers of harvard project physics. Research 1, 79–90 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558519

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02558519

Keywords

Navigation