Primates

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 515–523 | Cite as

The effect of inter-opponent distance on the occurrence of reconciliation in stumptail (Macaca arctoides) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

  • Josep Call
Research Report

Abstract

Several studies have shown that affiliative contact between opponents increases after conflicts in a number of primate species. This study investigated the effect of inter-opponent distance on the occurence of reconciliation in stumptail and rhesus macaques. Both species were represented by multi-male, multi-female groups housed in large outdoor compounds. Ten-minute focal animal observations during post-conflict (PC) and matched control (MC) samples were collected in which affiliative interactions and the inter-opponent distance at the beginning of each sample were recorded. A total of 251 and 561 PC-MC opponent pairs were obtained for stumptail and rhesus macaques, respectively. Inter-opponent distance was smaller in PC than in MC observations for both stumptail and rhesus macaques. Conciliatory tendency varied as a function of the initial PC-MC inter-opponent distance. In particular, the closer opponents were in PC compared to MC periods, the more likely they were to reconcile. When the inter-opponent distance was the same in PC and MC periods the conciliatory tendency of both species was notably reduced. These findings have implications for the estimation of conciliatory tendency and its use in comparative studies.

Key Words

Post-conflict behavior Reconciliation Inter-opponent distance Macaques Conciliatory tendency 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.Behaviour, 49: 227–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Aljreli, F. 1992. Post-conflict behaviour among wild long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 31: 329–337.Google Scholar
  3. Aljreli, F.;Das, M.;Veenema, H. C. 1997. Differential kinship effect on reconciliation in three species of macques (Macaca fascicularis, M. fuscata, andM. sylvanus).J. Comp. Psychol., 111: 91–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butovskaya, M. 1993. Kinship and different dominance styles in groups of three species of the Genus Macaca (M. arctoides, M. mulatta, andM. fascicularis).Folia Primatol., 60: 210–224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Call, J.;Judge, P. G.;de Waal, F. B. M. 1996. Influence of kinship and spatial density on reconciliation and grooming in rhesus monkeys.Amer. J. Primatol. 39: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castles, D. L.;Aureli, F.;de Waal, F. B. M. 1996. Variation in conciliatory tendency and relationship quality across groups of pigtail macaques.Anim. Behav. 52: 389–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. de Waal, F. B. M. 1989. Dominance ‘style’ and primate social organization. In:Comparative Socioecology,Standen,V.;Foley,R. (eds.), Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 243–263.Google Scholar
  8. de Waal, F. B. M. 1993. Reconciliation among primates: a review of empirical evidence and unresolved issues. In:Primate Social Conflict,Mason,W. A.;Mendoza,S. P. (eds.) SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 111–144.Google Scholar
  9. de Waal, F. B. M.;Ren, R. 1988. Comparison of the reconciliation behavior of stumptail and rhesus macaques.Ethology, 78: 129–142.Google Scholar
  10. de Waal, F. B. M.;Yoshihara, D. 1983. Reconciliation and redirected affection in rhesus monkeys.Behaviour, 85: 224–241.Google Scholar
  11. Kappeler, P. M.;van Schaik, C. P. 1992. Methodological and evolutionary aspects of reconciliation among primates.Ethology, 92: 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Petit, O.;Abegg, C.;Thierry, B. 1997. A comparative study of aggression and conciliation in three cercopithecine monkeys (Macaca fuscata, Macaca nigra, andPapio papio)Behaviour, 134: 415–432.Google Scholar
  13. Petit, O.;Thierry, B. 1994a Aggressive and peaceful interventions in conflicts in Tonkean macaques.Anim. Behav., 48: 1427–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petit, O.;Thierry, B. 1994b. Reconciliation in a group of black macaques (Macaca nigra).J. Wildlife Preservation Trust, 30: 89–95.Google Scholar
  15. Silk, J. B. 1997. The function of peaceful post-conflict contacts among primates.Primates, 8: 265–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Silk, J. B.;Cheney, D. L.;Seyfarth, R. M. 1996. The form and function of post-conflict interactions between female baboons.Anim. Behav. 52: 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Swedell, L. 1997. Patterns of reconciliation among captive gelada baboons (Theropithecus gelada): a brief report.Primates, 38: 325–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thierry, B. 1986. A comparative study of aggression and response to aggression in three species of macaque. In:Primate Ontogeny, Cognition and Social Behavior,Else,J. G.;Lee,P. C. (eds.), CambridgeUniv. Press, Cambridge, pp. 307–313.Google Scholar
  19. Eenema, H. C.;Das, M.;Aureli, F. 1994. Methodological improvements for the study of reconciliation.Behav. Proces., 31: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. York, A. D.;Rowell, T. E. 1988. Reconciliation following aggression in patas monkeysErythrocebus patas.Anim. Behav., 36: 502–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Monkey Centre 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Josep Call
    • 1
  1. 1.Univeristy of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations