Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The authors' reply

  • Letters to the Editor
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Knutson CO, Max MH. Value of colonoscopy in patients with rectal blood loss unexplained by rigid proctosigmoidoscopy and barium contrast enema examinations. Am J Surg 1980;139:84–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Muto T, Kamiya J, Sawada T, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy in diagnosis and treatment of early carcinoma of the large intestine. Dis Colon Rectum 1980;23:68–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tedesco FJ, Waye JD, Raskin JB, Morris SJ, Greenwald RA. Colonoscopic evaluation of rectal bleeding: a study of 304 patients. Ann Intern Med 1978;89:907–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Abrams JS. A second look at colonoscopy: indications, failures, and costs. Arch Surg 1982;117:913–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kiefer PJ, Thorson AG, Christensen MA. Metachronous colorectal cancer: time interval to presentation of a metachronous cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:378–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert DA, Shaneyfelt SL, Silverstein FE, Mahler AK, Hallstrom AP, and 674 members of the ASGE. The national ASGE colonoscopy survey—analysis of colonoscopic practices and yield (abstr). Gastrointest Endosc 1984;30:143.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fork FT. Double contrast enema and colonoscopy in polyp detection. Gut 1981;22:971–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rex DK, Lehman GA, Lappas JC, Miller RE. Sensitivity of double-contrast barium study for left-colon polyps. Radiology 1986;158:69–72.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Buckley JF, Christensen MA. The changing anatomic distribution of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum 1955–1980. Nebr Med J 1984;69:6–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Williams CB, Macrae FA, Bartram CI. A prospective study of diagnostic methods in adenoma follow-up. Endoscopy 1982;14: 74–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wolff WI, Shinya H, Geffen A, Ozoktay S, DeBeer R. Comparison of colonoscopy and the contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal disease. Am J Surg 1975;129:181–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fork FT, Lindström C, Ekelund GR. Reliability of routine double-contrast examination (DCE) of the large bowel in polyp detection: a prospective clinical study. Gastrointest Radiol 1983;8:163–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Thoeni RF, Menuck L. Comparison of barium enema and colonoscopy in the detection of small colonic polyps. Radiology 1977;124:631–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leinicke JL, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Stewart ET. A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colon. Gastrointest Radiol 1977;2:125–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dworkin DM, Winawer SJ. Neoplastic colonic polyps: a review. Curr Concepts Gastroenterol 1985;10:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Winawer SJ. Introduction to position papers from the third international symposium on colorectal cancer. CA 1984;34:130–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Thorson, A.G., Christensen, M.A. The authors' reply. Dis Colon Rectum 30, 74–75 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556934

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556934

Keywords

Navigation