Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Women at risk for developing osteoporosis: Determination by total body neutron activation analysis and photon absorptiometry

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

With stepwise multiple logistic regression (MLR), probabilistic classification equations were developed to identify asymptomatic women who are at risk for development of fracture of the spine. Clinically normal women with low TBCa/\(\sqrt H \) ratios can be classified as at risk for osteoporosis prior to their developing spinal compression fractures. With receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, it was possible to verify the accuracy of the MLR model to discriminate “normal” women at risk, with high sensitivity and specificity. With the MLR model, discrimination of osteoporotic women (50–59 years) was made correctly for 86.2% of the total osteoporotic subjects with the TBCa data. Similar models were derived from the photon absorptiometry data. From the spinal density (BDs) data, correct classification in the 50–59 year group was 55.6% of the total osteoporosis subjects; from the radius density (BMCr) data, the corresponding value was 31%. The highest probability of identifying osteoporosis in all age categories was, therefore, on the basis of TBCa data. Similar, but less accurate discrimination was achieved with the BDs and BMCr data. These conclusions were confirmed by the application of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Correct identification of the population at risk permits the timely and efficient application of therapeutic programs prior to onset of fracture. In a serial study of 104 perimenopausal women, for example, it was possible to determine theP value for individuals measured annually over a 3–10 year period and thus to predict normal individuals at risk for developing osteoporosis each year.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Osteoporosis NIH Consensus Development Conference Statement. Vol. 5, No. 3, 1984

  2. Cohn SH, Ellis KJ, Wallach S, Zanzi I, Atkins HL, Aloia JF (1974) Absolute and relative deficit in total skeletal calcium and radial bone mineral content in osteoporosis. J Nucl Med 15:428

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cohn SH, Vaswani AN, Zanzi I, Ellis KJ (1976) Effect of aging on bone mass in adult women. Am J Physiol 230:143

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohn SH, Zanzi I, Vaswani AN, Wallach S, Aloia JF, Ellis KJ (1976) Quantitation of the degree of osteoporosis by measure of total body calcium. Calcif Tissue Res 21:375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohn SH, ed (1981). Non-invasive measurements of bone mass and their clinical application. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, p 222

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee J (1980) Covariance adjustment of rates based on the multiple logistic regression model. J Chron Dis 34:415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McNeill BJ, Adelstein SJ (1976) Determining the value of diagnostic and screening tests. J Nucl Med 17:439

    Google Scholar 

  8. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8:283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen GF, Christiansen C, Boesin J, Hegedus V, Transbol I (1982) Epidemiology of postmenopausal spinal and long bone fractures, Clin Orthop 166:75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ott SM, Murano R, Lewellen TK, Nelp WP, Chesnut III CH (1983) Total body calcium by neutron activation analysis in normals and osteoporotic populations: a discriminator of significant bone loss. J Lab Clin Med 102:637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohn SH (1982) Techniques for determining the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. (Editorial) Int J Calcif Tissue 34:433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohn SH, Aloia JF, Yuen K, Vaswani AN (1984) Comparison of cross-sectional and longitudinal models of bone loss in women. XVIII Europ Symp on Calcif Tissue, Angers, France.

  13. Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Offord KP, Melton LJ (1981) Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular skeleton and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 67:328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazess RB, Peppler WW, Chesney RW, Lange TA, Lindgren U, Smith Jr E (1984) Total body and regional bone mineral by dual-photon absorptiometry in metabolic bone disease. Calcif Tissue Int 36:8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohn, S.H., Aloia, J.F., Vaswani, A.N. et al. Women at risk for developing osteoporosis: Determination by total body neutron activation analysis and photon absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 38, 9–15 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556588

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556588

Key words

Navigation