Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Osteogenesis by canine and rabbit bone marrow in diffusion chambers

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Osteogenic activity of canine and rabbit bone marrow and marrow stromal fibroblasts (MSF) derived from marrow culturedin vitro was evaluated using diffusion chambers. Marrow from young dogs and rabbits grown in cell culture produced confluent layers of MSF. Diffusion chambers containing 0.18–7.6×106 allogeneic MSF were inserted into the peritoneal cavities of 5 dogs and 6 rabbits. Chambers recovered from the dogs (15/16) contained only loose fibrous tissue while chambers from rabbits (9/13) contained membranous bone and cartilage. Diffusion chambers implanted with 1.0–32.4×107 fresh allogeneic marrow cells suspended in cell culture medium were inserted into the peritoneal cavities of 11 dogs and 9 rabbits for 3–8 weeks, and after recovery examined histologically. Membranous bone was formed in 4/40 chambers containing canine marrow while bone and hyaline cartilage was formed in 21/27 chambers containing rabbit marrow. This apparent species difference in incidence of bone marrow osteogenesis may relate to a lower concentration of osteogenic precursor cells in canine marrow, a failure of osteogenic precursor cells to differentiate to osteoblasts in a somewhat artificial environmentin vivo (viz diffusion chambers), a lack of cell-matrix interaction to stimulate cell differentiation, inappropriately short diffusion chamber implantation times post grafting, or a difference in ontogenetic stage of development of marrow donors with rabbit cells being physiologically younger.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashton BA, Allen TD, Howlett CR, Eaglesom CC, Hattori A, Owen M (1980) Formation of bone and cartilage by marrow stromal cells in diffusion chambersin vivo. Clin Orthop 151:294–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashton BA, Eaglesom CC, Bab I, Owen ME (1984) Distribution of fibroblast colony forming cells in rabbit bone marrow and assay of their osteogenic potential by anin vivo diffusion chamber method. Calcif Tissue Int 36:83–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bab I, Ashton BA, Syftestad GT, Owen ME (1984) Assessment of anin vivo diffusion chamber method as a quantitative assay for osteogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int 36:77–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bab I, Howlett CR, Ashton BA, Owen ME (1984) Ultrastructure of bone and cartilage formedin vivo in diffusion chambers. Clin Orthop 187:243–254

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Friedenstein AJ (1976) Precursor cells of mechanocytes. Int Rev Cytol 47:327–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Owen M (1982) Bone growth at the cellular level: A perspective. In: Dixon AD, Sarnat BG (eds) Factors and mechanisms influencing bone growth. Alan Liss Inc, New York, pp 19–28

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bab I, Ashton BA, Gazit D, Marx G, Williamson MC, Owen ME (1986) Kinetics and differentiation of marrow stromal cells in diffusion chambersin vivo. J Cell Sci 84:139–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Green E, Hinton C, Triffitt JT (1986) The effect of decalcified bone matrix on the osteogenic potential of bone marrow. Clin Orthop 205:292–298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Friedenstein AJ (1973) Determined and inducible osteogenic precursor cells. In: Hard tissue growth, repair and remineralization, Ciba Foundation Symposium 11, Elsevier-Exerpta Medica, North Holland, Amsterdam, 169–185

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rosin A, Freiberg H, Zajicek G (1963) The fate of rat bone marrow, spleen and periosteum cultivatedin vivo in the diffusion chamber, with special reference to bone formation. Exp Cell Res 29:176–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedenstein AJ, Piatetzky-Shapiro II, Petrakova KV (1966) Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 16:381–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Algire GH, Weaver JM, Prehn RT (1954) Growth of cellsin vivo in diffusion chambers. I. Survival of homografts in immunized mice. J Natl Cancer Instit 15:493–507

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sims B (1974) A simple method of preparing 1–2 μm sections of large tissue blocks using glycol methacrylate. J Microsc 101:223–227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS (1970) The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet 3:393–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson FD, Tavassoli M, Greenberg BR, Hinds D, Klein AK (1981) Morphological studies on “adherent cells” in bone marrow cultures from humans, dogs and mice. Stem Cells 1:15–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Budenz RW, Bernard GW (1980) Osteogenesis and leukopoiesis within diffusion-chamber implants of isolated bone marrow cell subpopulations. Am J Anat 159:455–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Furth R, Cohn ZA, Hirsch JG, Humphrey JH, Spector WG, Langevoort HL (1972) The mononuclear phagocyte system: A new classification of macrophages, monocytes and their precursors cells. Bull WHO 46:845–852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bab I, Ashton B, Owen M (1983) Morphological features of osteogenic tissue formed in diffusion chambersin vivo. Calcif Tissue Int 35(Suppl):A19

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walker RI, Herion JC, Dalldorf FG, Willemze R, Palmer G (1980) An evaluation of host cell contact in the regulation of diffusion chamber hematopoiesis. In: Cronkite EP, Carsten AL (eds) Diffusion chamber culture. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 150–156

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shaw JL, Bassett CAL (1967) The effects of varying oxygen concentration on osteogenesis and embryonic cartilagein vitro. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 49:73–80

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Leibovich SJ, Ross R (1975) The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. Am J Pathol 78:71–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Johnson KA, Howlett CR, Bellenger CR (1987) Omental response to long-term implantation of diffusion chambers containing allogeneic and xenogeneic bone marrow. Exp Pathol 32:31–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ashton BA, Williamson M, Campbell S, Bromley R, Smith R, Owen M (1985) Cells derived from human bonein vitro do not show an osteogenic responsein vivo. Calcif Tissue Int 38(Suppl):A1

    Google Scholar 

  24. Brighton CT, Krebs AG (1972) Oxygen tension of nonunion of fractured femurs in the rabbit. Surg Gynecol Obstet 135:379–385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson LD (1965) Compression plate fixation and the effect of different types of internal fixation on fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 47:191–209

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ham AW, Harris WR (1971) Repair and transplantation of bone. In: Bourne GH (ed) The biochemistry and physiology of bone. 2nd ed, vol 3, Academic Press, New York, pp 337–399

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Johnson, K.A., Howlett, C.R., Bellenger, C.R. et al. Osteogenesis by canine and rabbit bone marrow in diffusion chambers. Calcif Tissue Int 42, 113–118 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556343

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556343

Key Words

Navigation