Summary
Osteogenic activity of canine and rabbit bone marrow and marrow stromal fibroblasts (MSF) derived from marrow culturedin vitro was evaluated using diffusion chambers. Marrow from young dogs and rabbits grown in cell culture produced confluent layers of MSF. Diffusion chambers containing 0.18–7.6×106 allogeneic MSF were inserted into the peritoneal cavities of 5 dogs and 6 rabbits. Chambers recovered from the dogs (15/16) contained only loose fibrous tissue while chambers from rabbits (9/13) contained membranous bone and cartilage. Diffusion chambers implanted with 1.0–32.4×107 fresh allogeneic marrow cells suspended in cell culture medium were inserted into the peritoneal cavities of 11 dogs and 9 rabbits for 3–8 weeks, and after recovery examined histologically. Membranous bone was formed in 4/40 chambers containing canine marrow while bone and hyaline cartilage was formed in 21/27 chambers containing rabbit marrow. This apparent species difference in incidence of bone marrow osteogenesis may relate to a lower concentration of osteogenic precursor cells in canine marrow, a failure of osteogenic precursor cells to differentiate to osteoblasts in a somewhat artificial environmentin vivo (viz diffusion chambers), a lack of cell-matrix interaction to stimulate cell differentiation, inappropriately short diffusion chamber implantation times post grafting, or a difference in ontogenetic stage of development of marrow donors with rabbit cells being physiologically younger.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashton BA, Allen TD, Howlett CR, Eaglesom CC, Hattori A, Owen M (1980) Formation of bone and cartilage by marrow stromal cells in diffusion chambersin vivo. Clin Orthop 151:294–307
Ashton BA, Eaglesom CC, Bab I, Owen ME (1984) Distribution of fibroblast colony forming cells in rabbit bone marrow and assay of their osteogenic potential by anin vivo diffusion chamber method. Calcif Tissue Int 36:83–86
Bab I, Ashton BA, Syftestad GT, Owen ME (1984) Assessment of anin vivo diffusion chamber method as a quantitative assay for osteogenesis. Calcif Tissue Int 36:77–82
Bab I, Howlett CR, Ashton BA, Owen ME (1984) Ultrastructure of bone and cartilage formedin vivo in diffusion chambers. Clin Orthop 187:243–254
Friedenstein AJ (1976) Precursor cells of mechanocytes. Int Rev Cytol 47:327–355
Owen M (1982) Bone growth at the cellular level: A perspective. In: Dixon AD, Sarnat BG (eds) Factors and mechanisms influencing bone growth. Alan Liss Inc, New York, pp 19–28
Bab I, Ashton BA, Gazit D, Marx G, Williamson MC, Owen ME (1986) Kinetics and differentiation of marrow stromal cells in diffusion chambersin vivo. J Cell Sci 84:139–151
Green E, Hinton C, Triffitt JT (1986) The effect of decalcified bone matrix on the osteogenic potential of bone marrow. Clin Orthop 205:292–298
Friedenstein AJ (1973) Determined and inducible osteogenic precursor cells. In: Hard tissue growth, repair and remineralization, Ciba Foundation Symposium 11, Elsevier-Exerpta Medica, North Holland, Amsterdam, 169–185
Rosin A, Freiberg H, Zajicek G (1963) The fate of rat bone marrow, spleen and periosteum cultivatedin vivo in the diffusion chamber, with special reference to bone formation. Exp Cell Res 29:176–187
Friedenstein AJ, Piatetzky-Shapiro II, Petrakova KV (1966) Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells. J Embryol Exp Morphol 16:381–390
Algire GH, Weaver JM, Prehn RT (1954) Growth of cellsin vivo in diffusion chambers. I. Survival of homografts in immunized mice. J Natl Cancer Instit 15:493–507
Sims B (1974) A simple method of preparing 1–2 μm sections of large tissue blocks using glycol methacrylate. J Microsc 101:223–227
Friedenstein AJ, Chailakhjan RK, Lalykina KS (1970) The development of fibroblast colonies in monolayer cultures of guinea-pig bone marrow and spleen cells. Cell Tissue Kinet 3:393–402
Wilson FD, Tavassoli M, Greenberg BR, Hinds D, Klein AK (1981) Morphological studies on “adherent cells” in bone marrow cultures from humans, dogs and mice. Stem Cells 1:15–29
Budenz RW, Bernard GW (1980) Osteogenesis and leukopoiesis within diffusion-chamber implants of isolated bone marrow cell subpopulations. Am J Anat 159:455–474
Van Furth R, Cohn ZA, Hirsch JG, Humphrey JH, Spector WG, Langevoort HL (1972) The mononuclear phagocyte system: A new classification of macrophages, monocytes and their precursors cells. Bull WHO 46:845–852
Bab I, Ashton B, Owen M (1983) Morphological features of osteogenic tissue formed in diffusion chambersin vivo. Calcif Tissue Int 35(Suppl):A19
Walker RI, Herion JC, Dalldorf FG, Willemze R, Palmer G (1980) An evaluation of host cell contact in the regulation of diffusion chamber hematopoiesis. In: Cronkite EP, Carsten AL (eds) Diffusion chamber culture. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 150–156
Shaw JL, Bassett CAL (1967) The effects of varying oxygen concentration on osteogenesis and embryonic cartilagein vitro. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 49:73–80
Leibovich SJ, Ross R (1975) The role of the macrophage in wound repair. A study with hydrocortisone and antimacrophage serum. Am J Pathol 78:71–91
Johnson KA, Howlett CR, Bellenger CR (1987) Omental response to long-term implantation of diffusion chambers containing allogeneic and xenogeneic bone marrow. Exp Pathol 32:31–39
Ashton BA, Williamson M, Campbell S, Bromley R, Smith R, Owen M (1985) Cells derived from human bonein vitro do not show an osteogenic responsein vivo. Calcif Tissue Int 38(Suppl):A1
Brighton CT, Krebs AG (1972) Oxygen tension of nonunion of fractured femurs in the rabbit. Surg Gynecol Obstet 135:379–385
Anderson LD (1965) Compression plate fixation and the effect of different types of internal fixation on fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 47:191–209
Ham AW, Harris WR (1971) Repair and transplantation of bone. In: Bourne GH (ed) The biochemistry and physiology of bone. 2nd ed, vol 3, Academic Press, New York, pp 337–399
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, K.A., Howlett, C.R., Bellenger, C.R. et al. Osteogenesis by canine and rabbit bone marrow in diffusion chambers. Calcif Tissue Int 42, 113–118 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556343
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02556343