Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimation of the bone mineral density variation associated with changes in turnover rate

  • Laboratory Investigations
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

Bone matrix mineral density (BMDn, fraction of maximum) is the mean mineral density of a bone sample comprising moieties of bone of varying ages/mineral densities. A method for calculating BMDn as a function of bone turnover rate is presented. The method is based on a mineralization curve defined by values for mineralization lag time, total mineralization time, and levels of primary and final mineralization. The calculations illustrate that BMDn decreases linearly in direct proportion to increases in bone turnover rate, and that the slope of the line is dependent on the assumptions used to calculate the mineralization curve. BMDn variation is important because it is reflected in whole bone density variation, independent of changes in bone mass, when bone turnover rate is altered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parfitt AM (1980) Morphologic basis of bone mineral measurements: transient and steady state effects of treatment in osteoporosis. Mineral Electrolyte Metab 4:273–287

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR (1987) Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units. J Bone Min Res 2:595–610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Parfitt AM (1983) The physiologic and clinical significance of bone histomorphometric data. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla., pp 143–223

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amprino R, Engstrom A (1952) Studies on x-ray absorption and diffraction of bone tissue. Acta Anatomica 15:1–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jowsey J (1960) Age changes in human bone. Clin Orthop 17:210–218

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frost HM (1960) Micropetrosis. J Bone Joint Surg 42A:144–150

    Google Scholar 

  7. Parfitt AM (1987) Pathogenesis of vertebral fracture: qualitative abnormalities in bone architecture and bone age. In: Osteoporosis: current concepts. Ross Laboratories. Columbus, Ohio pp 18–22

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hattner R, Frost HM (1963) Mean skeletal age: its calculation, and theoretical effects on skeletal tracer physiology and on the physical characteristics of bone. Henry Ford Hosp Med Bull 11:201–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaworski ZFG (1983) Histomorphometric characteristics of metabolic bone disease. In: Recker RR (ed) Bone histomorphometry: techniques and interpretation. Boca Raton, Fla, CRC Press pp 241–263

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parfitt AM (1983) Calcitonin in the pathogenesis and prevention of osteoporosis. Triangle 22:91–102

    Google Scholar 

  11. Polig E, Jee WSS (1987) Bone age and remodeling: a mathematical treatise. Calcif Tissue Int 41:130–136

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marotti G, Favia A, Zallone AZ (1972) Quantitative analysis on the rate of secondary mineralization. Calcif Tissue Res 10:67–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wergedal JE, Baylink DJ (1974) Electron microprobe measurements of bone mineralization rate in vivo. Am J Physiol 226:345–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowland RE, Jowsey J, Marshall JH (1959) Microscopic metabolism of calcium in bone. III. Microradiographic measurements of mineral density. Radiat Res 10:234–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wollast R, Burney F (1971) Study of bone mineralization at the microscopic level using an electron probe microanalyzer. Calcif Tissue Res 8:73–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jowsey J, Kelly PJ, Riggs BL, Bianco AJ, Scholz DA, Gershon-Cohen J (1965) Quantitative microradiographic studies of normal and osteoporotic bone. J Bone Jt Surg 47A:785–806, 872

    Google Scholar 

  17. Obrant KJ, Odselius R (1984) Electron microprobe analysis and histochemical examination of the calcium distribution in human bone trabeculae: a methodological study using biopsy specimens from post-traumatic osteopenia. Ultrastruct Pathol 7:123–131

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Parfitt AM (1987) Bone and plasma calcium homeostasis. Bone 8 (suppl 1):S1-S8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pugliese LR, Anderson C (1986) A method for the determination of the relative distribution and relative quantity of mineral in bone sections. J Histotechnol 9:91–93

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jaworski ZFG (1987) Does the mechanical usage (MU) inhibit bone “remodeling”? Calcif Tissue Int 41:239–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruth EB (1953) Bone studies. II. An experimental study of the haversian-type vascular channels. Am J Anat 93:429–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jerome, C.P. Estimation of the bone mineral density variation associated with changes in turnover rate. Calcif Tissue Int 44, 406–410 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555969

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555969

Key words

Navigation