Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abdominalvs. Perineal drainage in rectal surgery

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The efficiency of abdominal contra perineal drainage of the pelvic cavity after abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the rectum was evaluated retrospectively with regard to the frequency of perineal wound sepsis and length of hospital stay. Thirty-two (45 percent) of 71 patients with perineal drainage developed perineal wound sepsis, compared with four (12 percent) of 32 patients with abdominal drainage (P<0.01). Patients with perineal drainage stayed longer in the hospital (mean, 33 days) than those with abdominal drainage (mean, 24 days) (P<0.004). Furthermore, postoperative recovery was more comfortable in patients with abdominal drainage. Abdominal drainage therefore is recommended after abdominoperineal resection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miles WE. A method of performing abdominoperineal excision for carcinoma of the rectum and of the terminal portion of the pelvic colon. Lancet 1908;2:1812–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hultén L, Kewenter J, Knutsson U, Olbe L. Primary closure of perineal wound after proctocolectomy or rectal excision. Acta Chir Scand 1971;137:467–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Irvin TT, Goligher JC. A controlled clinical trial of three different methods of perineal wound management following excision of the rectum. Br J Surg 1975;62:287–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hartz RS, Poticha SM, Shields TW. Healing of the perineal wound. Arch Surg 1980;115:471–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Påhlman L, Glimelius B, Graffman S. Pre- versus postoperative radiotherapy in rectal carcinoma: an interim report from a randomized multicentre trial. Br J Surg 1985;72:961–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Påhlman L, Glimelius B, Ginman C, Graffman S, Adalsteinsson B. Preoperative irradiation of primarily non-resectable adenocarcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Acta Radiol Oncol 1985;24: 35–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watts JMcK, DeDombal FT, Goligher JC. Long-term complications and prognosis following major surgery for ulcerative colitis. Br J Surg 1966;53:1014–23.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Warshaw AL, Ottinger LW, Bartlett MK. Primary perineal closure after proctocolectomy for inflammatory bowel disease: prevention of the persistent perineal sinus. Am J Surg 1977;133:414–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by grants from the Åke Wiberg Research Foundation and the Swedish Cancer Society (Project No. 1783-B85-06XA).

About this article

Cite this article

Påhlman, L., Enblad, P. & Ståhle, E. Abdominalvs. Perineal drainage in rectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 30, 372–375 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555457

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555457

Key words

Navigation