Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does an erroneous diagnosis of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal margin at first physician visit influence prognosis?

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Patients with squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal (n=125) and its margin (n=76) were divided into five groups: those with an erroneous diagnosis and a correct diagnosis made at first physician visit; those with a history of less than six months, between six and 18 months, and more than 18 months. Patients with canal tumors had an erroneous diagnosis made more frequently than patients with margin tumors. In both groups patients with an erroneous diagnosis had longer histories than patients with a correct diagnosis. Among patients with erroneously diagnosed canal tumor, pain, the feeling of a lump, anal discharge, and pruritus ani occurred less frequently than among correctly diagnosed patients. The prognosis was worse among patients with erroneously diagnosed canal tumors compared with correctly diagnosed patients. Such a difference could not be found among patients with margin tumors. There was a gradual worsening of the prognosis among patients with increasing length of history and canal tumors, in contrast to patients with margin tumors, in whom only a history of more than 18 months was associated with a worse prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sawyers JL. Current management of carcinoma of the anus and perianus. Am Surg 1977;43:424–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gabriel WB. Squamous-cell carcinoma of the anus and anal canal: an analysis of 55 cases. Proc R Soc Med 1941;34:139–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nielsen OV, Jensen SL. Basal cell carcinoma of the anus—a clinical study of 34 cases. Br J Surg 1981;68:856–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nielsen OV, Jensen SL. Anal cancer in Denmark 1943–1973. I. Planocellular carcinoma of the anus, the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. Ugeskr Laeger 1982;144:851–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berkson J, Gage RP. Survival curves for cancer patients after treatment. J Am Statist Assoc 1952;47:501–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boman BM, Moertel CG, O'Connell MJ, et al. Carcinoma of the anal canal: a clinical and pathologic study of 188 cases. Cancer 1984;54:114–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frost DB, Richards PC, Montague ED, Giacco GG, Martin RG. Epidermoid cancer of the anorectum. Cancer 1984;53:1285–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum, and colon. 5th ed. London: Bailliere-Tindall, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Greenall MJ, Quan SH, Stearns MW, Urmacher C, DeCosse JJ. Epidermoid cancer of the anal margin: pathologic features, treatment, and clinical results. Am J Surg 1985;149:95–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McConnell EM. Squamous carcinoma of the anus—a review of 96 cases. Br J Surg 1970;57:89–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morson BC. The pathology and results of treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal margin. Proc R Soc Med 1960;53:416–20.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singh R, Nime F, Mittelman A. Malignant epithelial tumors of the anal canal. Cancer 1981;48:411–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klotz RG Jr, Pamukcoglu T, Souilliard DH. Transitional cloacogenic carcinoma of the anal canal. Cancer 1967;20:1727–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stearns MW Jr, Urmacher C, Sternberg SS, Woodruff J, Attiyeh F. Cancer of the anal canal. Curr Probl Cancer 1980;4:1–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Papillon J. Rectal and anal cancers: conservative treatment by irradiation—an alternative to radical surgery. New York. Springer-Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paradis P, Douglass HO Jr, Holyoke ED. The clinical implications of a staging system for carcinoma of the anus. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975;141:411–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Jensen, S.L., Hagen, K., Shokouh-Amiri, M.H. et al. Does an erroneous diagnosis of squamous-cell carcinoma of the anal canal and anal margin at first physician visit influence prognosis?. Dis Colon Rectum 30, 345–351 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555452

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555452

Key words

Navigation