Skip to main content
Log in

Changing survival prospects in rectal carcinoma

A series of 1306 patients managed by one surgeon

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Cancer-specific survival prospects for rectal carcinoma in a series of 1306 patients managed from 1950 to 1979 by one surgeon worsened from 1970 to 1979. The prognosis was worse for all patients treated operatively from 1970 to 1979 compared with 1960 to 1969 (P<0.03). After potentially curative resection, survival was worse from 1970 to 1979 compared with 1950 to 1959 (P<0.02) and 1960 to 1969 (P<0.01), respectively; the corresponding five-year survivals were 72.5 percent, 72.3 percent, and 61.5 percent. The curative resection rate for the three decades was similar (66 to 70 percent). An increase in the incidence of Dukes' Stage C tumors from 23.3 percent to 32.3 percent (P<0.01) explains, at least partly, the decreased survival. The worsened survival prospects were not accounted for by changes in referral pattern, tumor site, or in the proportion of sphincter-saving resections performed. The worsening was paradoxically paralleled by earlier symptomatic presentation (P<0.001). Analyses of other Australian data are required to test the hypothesis that the worsened survival prospects are consequent to altered tumor biologic aggressiveness, possibly related to differences in the causal factors operating over the 30-year study period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McDermott FT, Hughes ES, Pihl EA, Milne BJ. Changing survival prospects in carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1980;67:775–80.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dukes CE. The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol 1932;35:323–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hughes ES. Long-term study of large-bowel cancer. Med J Aust 1976;2:365–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nie NH, Bent DH, Hull CH. SPSS: statistical package for the social sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gehan EA. A generalised Wilcoxon test for comparing arbitrarily singly-censored samples. Biometrika 1965;62:203–23.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lockhart-Mummery HE, Ritchie JK, Hawley PR. The results of surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum at St Mark's Hospital from 1948 to 1972. Br J Surg 1976;63:673–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson SM, Beahrs OH. The curative treatment of carcinoma of the sigmoid, rectosigmoid, and rectum. Ann Surg 1976;183:556–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Whittaker M, Goligher JC. The prognosis after surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1976;63:384–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cohen JR, Theile DE, Evans EB, m Quinn RL, Davis NC. Colorectal cancer at the Princess Alexandra Hospital: a prospective study of 729 cases. Aust NZ J Surg 1983;53:113–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McDermott F, Hughes ES, Pihl E, Milne BJ, Price A. Long term results of restorative resection and total excision for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;154:833–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McMichael AJ, Potter JD, Hetzel BS. Time trends in colo-rectal cancer mortality in relation to food and alcohol consumption: United States, United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand. Int J Epidemiol 1979;8:295–303.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by a grant from the Anti-Cancer Council of Victoria.

About this article

Cite this article

McDermott, F.T., Hughes, E.S.R., Pihl, E.A. et al. Changing survival prospects in rectal carcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 29, 798–803 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555348

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02555348

Key words

Navigation