Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examination in the identification of adenomas and carcinoma of the colon

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

To assess the accuracy of the flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscope, 227 consecutive patients (mean age 61.8±13 years) requiring investigation of colonic symptoms were evaluated using rigid and flexible sigmoidoscopy (PAF and KDV) and double-contrast barium enema (SSA). Patients with equivocal findings or adenomatous polyps underwent colonoscopy (TWB). Thirty-four patients had carcinoma and 50 patients had one or more adenomatous polyps (>5mm). The neoplastic yield from rigid sigmoidoscopy was 12 per cent, flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy 90 per cent, and double-contrast barium enema only 76 per cent. Barium enema failed to identify eight carcinomas and 13 adenomatous polyps; seven of the eight carcinomas were polypoid Dukes' Stage A lesions, and associated diverticular disease was present in 62.5 per cent of cases. Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy failed to identify seven carcinomas and one adenomatous polyp. Five of the carcinomas were beyond range of the instrument; in one patient, a stricture was seen that was caused by the carcinoma; and in the seventh patient, the examination was terminated because of angulation spasm. Double-contrast barium enema is inaccurate in detecting lesions in the sigmoid colon, with flexible sigmoidoscopy being superior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Theoni RF, Menuck L. Comparison of barium enema and colonoscopy in the detection of colonic polyps. Radiology 1977;124:631–5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ott DJ, Gelfand DW, Ramquist NA. Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. Gastrointest Radiol 1980;5:99–105.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Silverman DT, Murray JL, Smart CR, Braun CC, Myers MH. Estimated median survival times of patients with colorectal cancer based on experience with 9,745 patients. Am J Surg 1977;133 289–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Marks G, Boggs HW, Castro AF, Gathright JB, Ray JE, Salvati E. Sigmoidoscopic examinations with rigid and flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopes in the surgeon's office: a comparative prospective study of effectiveness in 1,012 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 1979;22:162–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vellacott KD, Hardcastle JD. Comparison of rigid and flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy with double contrast barium enema. Br J Surg 1982;69:399–400.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller RE. Detection of colon carcinoma and the barium enema. JAMA 1974;230:1195–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dukes CE, Bussey HJ. The spread of rectal cancer and its effect on prognosis. Br J Cancer 1958;12:309–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gill PG, Morris PJ. The survey of patients with colorectal cancer treated in a regional hospital. Br J Surg 1978;65:17–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Farands, P.A., Vellacott, K.D., Amar, S.S. et al. Flexible fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy and double-contrast barium-enema examination in the identification of adenomas and carcinoma of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 26, 725–727 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554983

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554983

Key words

Navigation