Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

En bloc excision of lower ureter and internal iliac vessels for locally advanced upper rectal and rectosigmoid cancer

Use of ileal segment for ureteral repair

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Eight patients who receiveden bloc excision of the ureter and internal iliac vessels for locally advanced upper rectal and rectosigmoid cancer were reported. Indications, techniques, functional results of the ileal ureter, and prognosis of these patients are discussed. Although three patients died of recurrent tumor—one of transperitoneal spread and two of liver metastasis—none of them developed local recurrent growth. As a replacement for the resected ureter, ileal substitution was applied in all eight patients—unilateral in six patients and bilateral in two. Serum creatinine and electrolyte patterns were within the normal range in all patients. A voiding cystogram showed no reflux to the anastomosed ureter, and a mild reflux to the ileal segment. The patients had excellent prognoses with regard to local control and also satisfactory functional results with the ileal ureter. The authors recommend that this procedure be applied to patients with locally advanced cancer such as those in this series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goodwin WE, Winter CC, Turner RD. Replacement of the ureter by small intestine: clinical application and results of “ileal ureter.” J Urol 1959;81:406–18.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Deddish MR. Discussion on the treatment of advanced cancer of the rectum. Proc R Soc Med 1950;43:1075–81.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sauer I, Bacon HE. Influence of lateral spread of cancer of the rectum on radicability of operation and prognosis. Am J Surg 1951;81:111–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stearns MW Jr, Deddish MR. Five-year results of abdominopelvic lymph node dissection for carcinoma of the rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:169–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Koyama Y, Moriya Y, Hojo K. Effects of extended systematic lymphadenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the rectum—significant improvement of survival rate and decrease of local recurrence. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1984;14:623–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moriya Y, Koyama Y, Hojo K, Hirota T, Itabashi M. Local recurrence after sphincter-saving procedures for carcinoma of the rectum: an analysis of 141 cases. Jpn J Clin Oncol 1980;10: 265–70.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5th ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1984;594–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wells CA. The use of the intestine in urology: omitting ureterocolic anastomosis. Br J Urol 1956;28:335–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Moore EV, Weber R, Woodward ER, Moore JG, Goodwin WE. Isolated ileal loops for ureteral repair. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1956;102:87–97.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boxer RJ, Fritzsche P, Skinner DG, et al. Replacement of the ureter by small intestine: clinical application and results of the ileal ureter in 89 patients. J Urol 1979;121:728–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Moriya, Y., Hojo, K. & Sawada, T. En bloc excision of lower ureter and internal iliac vessels for locally advanced upper rectal and rectosigmoid cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 31, 872–878 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554852

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554852

Key words

Navigation