Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intestinal suturing

Review of the experimental foundations for traditional doctrines

  • Current Status
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The doctrines of intestinal suturing have been handed down from the 19th century. It has been widely accepted that intestinal wounds heal most reliably when an inverting suture line is constructred. The serosal surfaces of the bowel should be apposed by sutures, anchored in the submucosa, forming and inverting suture line. The wound should be kept free of hematoma, necrotic tissue, or infection. Intestinal wounds heal with a patterns similar to that of wounds in other tissues. During the lag period of repair, the wound is cleansed of debris. Excessive tissue injury, foreign body, or infection incite inflammation, prolonging this period of wound healing. Cellular elements proliferate during the phase of fibroplasia. Collagen within the wound assumes its mature form only during the prolonged phase of maturation. The return of wound integrity can be quantified by measuring its tensile strength, bursting strength, or collagen content. Such measurements have shown that, during the lag period, sutures provide almost the entire strength of the wound. During the phase of fibroplasia, new collagen adds to the suture line integrity. The contribution of new collagen to wound strength soon overtakes that of sutures. It is only during the first week of wound healing, the lag period, that surgical technique plays a significant role in ensuring intestinal wound integrity. Surgical techniques developed during the 19th century provide secure closure of intestinal wounds during the lag period of wound healing. After the onset of the period of fibroplasia, newly formed collagen replaces sutures in ensuring wound integrity

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Travers B. An inquiry into the process of nature in repairing injuries of the intestines: illustrating the treatment of penetrating wounds, and strangulated hernia. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown, 1812.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Senn N. Enterorrhaphy; its history, technique, and present status. JAMA 1893;21:215–35.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lembert A. Nouveau procede d'enterorraphie. Repertoire General d'Anatome et de Physiologie Pathologique 1826;2:3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lembert A. Nouveau procede d'enterorraphie Arch Gen Med 1827;13:234.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Czerny. Quoted by Jaffee K. Uber darmresection bei gangranosen hernien. Sammlung Klinischer Vorträge 1883;201:1689–1702.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Connell ME. An experimental contribution looking to an improved technique in entorrhaphy, whereby the number of knots is reduced to two, or even one. Med Rec 1892;42:335–7.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Halstead WS. Circular suture of the intestine—an experimental study. Am J Med Sci 1887;94:436–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reid MR. Some considerations of the problems of wound healing. N Engl J Med 1936;215:753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Carrel A. The treatment of wounds. JAMA 1910;55:2148–50.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Howes EL, Sooy JW, Harvey SC. The healing of wounds as determined by their tensile strength. JAMA 1929;92:42–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sandbloom P. The tensile strength of healing wounds: an experimental study. Acta Chir Scand 1944;90 (Suppl 89):1–108.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Herrmann JB, Woodward MD, Pulaski J. Healing of colonic anastomoses in the rat. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1964;119:269–75.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Weilbaecher DA, Mathieu FJ, Cohn I Jr. Nonsuture intestinal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1964;107:353–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Getzen LC. Intestinal suturing: II. Inverting and everting intestinal sutures. Curr Probl Surg 1969;Sept:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Winkle W Jr. The tensile strength of wounds and factors that influence it. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969;129:819–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paget J. Lecutures on surgical pathology. Philadelphia: Lindsay and Blakiston 1853; 1:271.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chlumsky V. Experimentelle untersuchungenuber die verschiedenen method der darmvereinigung. Beiträge zur Klinisch Chirurgie 1899;25:539–600.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Levenson SM, Geever EF, Growley LV, Oates JF, Berard CW, Rosen H. The healing of rat skin wounds. Ann Surg 1965;161:293–308.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lichtenstein IL, Herz S, Koff S, et al. The dynamics of wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;130:685–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Adamsons RJ, Musco F, Enquist IF. The relationship of collagen content to wound strength in normal and scorbutic animals. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1964;119:323–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses: II. Breaking strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis. Am J Surg 1978;136:595–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harvey SC. The velocity of the growth of fibroblasts in the healing wound. Arch Surg 1929;18:1227–40.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968;126:747–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Trueblood HW, Nelsen TS, Kohatsu S, Oberhelman HA. Wound healing in the colon: comparison of inverted and everted closures. Surgery 1969;65:919–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses: I. Bursting strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis. Am J Surg 1978;136:587–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Irvin TT, Edwards JP. Comparison of single-layer inverting, two-layer inverting, and everting anastomoses in the rabbit colon. Br J Surg 1973;60:453–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fellows NM, Burge J, Hatch CS, Price PB. Suture strength and healing strength of end-to-end intestinal anastomoses. Surg Forum 1951;2:111–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Getzen LC, Roe RD, Holloway CK. Comparative study of intestinal anastomotic healing in inverted and everted closures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1966;123:1219–27.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hamilton JE. Reappraisal of open intestinal anastomoses. Ann Surg 1967;165:917–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McAdams AJ, Meikle AG, Taylor JO. One layer or two layer colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 1970;120:546–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wise L, McAlister W, Stein T, Schuck P. Studies on the healing of anastomoses of small and large intestines. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975;141:190–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Nelsen TS, Anders CJ. Dynamic aspects of small intestinal rupture with special consideration of anastomotic strength. Arch Surg 1966;93:309–14.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Burr HS, Harvey SC, Taffel M. Bio-electric correlates of wound healing. Yale J Biol Med 1938;11:103–7.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Edwards LC, Dunphy JE. Wound healing; I. Injury and normal repair. N Engl J Med 1958;259:224–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Peacock EE Jr. Some aspects of fibrogenesis during the healing of primary and secondary wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962;115:408–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Robbins SL, Cotran RS. Inflammation and repair. In: Pathologic basis of disease. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Van Winkle W Jr. The fibroblast in wound healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1967;124:369–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rosenthal S, Lerner B, Dibiase F, Enquist IF. Relation of strength to composition in diabetic wounds. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1962;115:437–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Adamsons RI, Musco F, Enquist IF. The comparative effects of silk and catgut on collagen lysis during the lag phase of primary healing. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1965;121:1028–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Madden JW, Peacock EE Jr. Measurement of the rate of collagen synthesis in sutured rat wounds. Surg Forum 1967;18:58–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Madden JW, Peacock EE Jr. Studies on the biology of collagen during wound healing: I. Rate of collagen synthesis and deposition in cutaneous wounds of the rat. Surgery 1968;64:288–94.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Stein HD, Keiser HR, Sjoerdsma A. Collagen synthesis in granulating wounds of rats and man. Surg Forum 1969;20:63–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hawley PR, Faulk P, Hunt TK, Dunphy JE. Collagenase activity in the gastro-intestinal tract. Br J Surg 1970;57:896–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Peacock EE Jr. Inter- and intramolecular bonding in collagen of healing wounds by insertion of methylene and amide cross-links into scar tissue: tensile strength and thermal shrinkage in rats. Ann Surg 1966;163:1–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE. Specific activity of hydroxyproline-tritium in the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968;126:1061–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Hawley PR, Faulk WP. A circulatory collagenase inhibitor. Br J Surg 1970;57:900–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Yamakawa T, Patin CS, Sobel S, Morgenstern L. Healing of colonic anastomoses following resection for experimental “diverticulitis”. Arch Surg 1971;103:17–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Morgenstern L, Yamakawa T, Ben-Shoshan M, Lippman H. Anastomotic leakage after low colonic anastomosis: clinical and experimental aspects. Am J Surg 1972;123:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Klein L, Rudolph R. H-collagen turnover in skin grafts. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972;135:49–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Klein L, Lewis A. Simultaneous quantification of 3H-collagen loss and 1H-collagen replacement during healing of rat tendon grafts. J Bone Joint Surg 1972;54:137–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Irvin TT, Hunt TK. The effect of trauma on colonic healing. Br J Surg 1974;61:430–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, St. Luke's Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio

    Garth H. Ballantyne M.D.

Authors
  1. Garth H. Ballantyne M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Ballantyne, G.H. Intestinal suturing. Dis Colon Rectum 26, 836–843 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554767

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554767

Key words

Search

Navigation