Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Temporary ileostomy for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Function and complications

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The function and complications associated with temporary ileostomies were reviewed in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. A series of 180 patients had temporary ileostomies established (157 loop, 23 Brooke). Patients with incomplete fecal diversion had a significantly higher incidence of pouch-anal anastomotic complications (44 percent) than did those with complete diversion (14 percent). Patients with loop ileostomies were more likely than patients with Brooke ileostomies to develop technique-related complications (18 percent vs. 13 percent) and peristomal irritation (54 percent vs. 26 percent). The most frequent complications after take-down of the ileostomy were transient bowel obstruction (13 percent) and peritonitis (7 percent). These complications could not be related to the type of stoma used or the interval to closure. Temporary diversion of a pouch-anal anastomosis decreased the incidence of anastomotic complications. These ileostomies, however, are associated with a significant risk of complications, which can be minimized by meticulous surgical technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Beart RW, Wolff BG. Ileal “J” pouch-anal anastomosis; clinical outcome. Ann Surg 1985;202:735–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicholls RJ, Pezim ME. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir: a comparison between the three loop and two loop reservoir (abstr). Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:565.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fonkalsrud EW. Endorectal ileoanal anastomosis with isoperistaltic ileal reservoir after colectomy and mucosal proctectomy. Ann Surg 1984;199:151–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rothenberger DA, Vermeulen FD, Christenson CE, et al. Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir and ileoanal anastomosis. Am J Surg 1983;145:82–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander-Williams J. Loop ileostomy and colostomy for faecal diversion. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1974;54:141–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Babcock G, Bivins BA, Sachatello CR. Technical complications of ileostomy. South Med J 1980;73:329–31.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fasth S, Hultén L. Loop ileostomy: a superior diverting stoma in colorectal surgery. World J Surg 1984;8:401–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thow GB. Single-stage colectomy and mucosal proctectomy with stapled antiperistaltic ileoanal reservoir. In: Dozois RR, ed. Alternatives to conventional ileostomy. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1985:420–32.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Metcalf AM, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Wolff BG. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis without temporary diverting ileostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:33–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stryker SJ, Borody TJ, Phillips SF, Kelly KA, Dozois RR, Beart RW Jr. Motility of the small intestine after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1985;201:351–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read in part at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, San Diego, California, May 5 to 10, 1985.

About this article

Cite this article

Metcalf, A.M., Dozois, R.R., Beart, R.W. et al. Temporary ileostomy for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 29, 300–303 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554114

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554114

Key words

Navigation