Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis

An experimental study

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

A biofragmentable bowel anastomosis ring (BAR) for sutureless intestinal anastomosis is described with the laboratory results comparing the BAR to sutured and stapled anastomoses. There was equivalent healing with all three methods of anastomosis. However, “burst” pressure was highest at day zero and overall necrosis was least with the BAR. By virtue of these findings and being sutureless, it is hoped that the limits of safe bowel anastomosis can be extended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fraser I. An historical perspective on mechanical aids in intestinal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;155:566–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Murphy JB. Choleysto-intestinal, gastro-intestinal, entero-intestinal anastomosis, and approximation without sutures (original research). Med Rec 1892;42:665–76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Senn N. Enterorrhaphy; its history, technique and present status. JAMA 1893;21:215–35.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Irvin TT, Hunt TK. Reappraisal of the healing process of anastomosis of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;138:741–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cronin K, Dunphy JE, Jackson OS. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968;126:747–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ballantyne GH. Intestinal suturing: review of the experimental foundations for traditional doctrines. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:836–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ballantyne GH. The experimental basis of intestinal suturing: effect of surgical technique, inflammation, and infection on enteric wound healing. Dis Colon Rectum 1984;27:61–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

    William G. Pace M.D.

  2. Davis & Geck, Lederle Laboratories, American Cyanamid Company, Pearl River, New York

    John W. Maney B.A., Abraham R. Katz M.S. & Alan L. Kagano D.Sc.

  3. Central Ohio Colon and Rectal Center, Grant Hospital, 300 East Town Street, 43215, Columbus, Ohio

    Thomas G. Hardy Jr. M.D.

Authors
  1. Thomas G. Hardy Jr. M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. William G. Pace M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John W. Maney B.A.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Abraham R. Katz M.S.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alan L. Kagano D.Sc.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Read at the joint meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons with the Section of Colo-Proctology, Royal Society of Medicine, and the Section of Colonic and Rectal Surgery, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, New Orleans, Louisiana, May 6 to 11, 1984.

About this article

Cite this article

Hardy, T.G., Pace, W.G., Maney, J.W. et al. A biofragmentable ring for sutureless bowel anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 28, 484–490 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554090

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02554090

Key words

Search

Navigation