Wound healing in the intestinal wall

A comparison between experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses


The healing of ileal and colonic anastomoses is compared in rabbits. The intestinal segment that contains the anastomosis shows a temporary loss of strength, which is reflected in a decreased bursting pressure. This loss of strength is accompanied by a massive loss of collagen, measured as hydroxyproline, both in ileum and in colon. In ileum, hydroxyproline concentrations, expressed on a dry weight basis, are lowered by 30 per cent, one day after operation. Thereafter, they rise again, after seven days reaching a level that is 40 per cent enhanced as compared with unwounded tissue. Maximal decrease in colon, measured two days after operation, is 40 per cent. After seven days hydroxyproline levels are back at preoperative values. In colon, significant loss of hydroxyproline is also apparent in the intestinal segment proximal to the anastomosis. This phenomenon does not occur in ileum. These results clearly demonstrate that after ileal anastomosis a loss of collagen occurs similar to that in colonic anastomoses. The fact that the loss of collagen is less extensive and more rapidly restored may be important in explaining the lesser incidence of leakage encountered after surgery of the small intestine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.

    Debas HT, Thomson FB. A critical review of colectomy with anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972;135:747–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Irvin TT, Goligher JC. Aetiology of disruption of intestinal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1973;60:461–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Morgenstern L, Yamakawa T, Ben-Shoshan M, Lippman H. Anastomotic leakage after low colonic anastomosis. Am J Surg 1972;123:104–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE. Factors contributing to leakage of colonic anastomosis. Ann Surg 1973;177:513–8.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Fogdestam I, Gottrup F. Biomechanical methods in woundhealing research with special reference to skin and gastrointestinal tract. In: Viidik A, Vuust J, eds. Biology of collagen. London: Academic Press, 1980:363–71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cronin K, Jackson DS, Dunphy JE. Changing bursting strength and collagen content of the healing colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1968;126:747–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Hawley PR, Page Faulk W, Hunt TK, Dunphy JE. Collagenase activity in the gastro-intestinal tract. Br J Surg 1970;57:896–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Irvin TT, Hunt TK. Reappraisal of the healing process of anastomosis of the colon. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1974;138:741–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses. The effect of suture technique on collagen concentration in the colonic wall. Am J Surg 135;1978:333–40.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Prockop DJ, Udenfriend S. A specific method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in tissues and urine. Anal Biochem 1960;1:228–39.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jackson DS, Cleary EG. The determination of collagen and elastin. In: Glick D, ed. Methods of biochemical analysis, Vol XV. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1967:25–76.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hunt TK, Hawley PR, Hale J, Goodson W, Thakral KK. Colon repair: the collagenous equilibrium. In: Hunt TK, ed. Wound healing and wound infection. Theory and surgical practice. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1980:153–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Klein L, Chandrarajan J. Collagen degradation in rat skin but not in intestine during rapid growth: effect on collagen types I and III from skin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1977;74:1436–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses: IV. Effect of suturing technique on collagen metabolism in the colonic wall. Am J Surg 1980;139:406–13.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Stromberg BV, Klein L. Collagen formation during the healing of colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:301–4.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wise L, McAlister W, Stein T, Schuck P. Studies on the healing of anastomoses of small and large intestines. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1975;141:190–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Nelsen TS, Anders CJ. Dynamic aspects of small intestinal rupture with special consideration of anastomotic strength. Arch Surg 1966;93:309–13.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Jiborn H, Ahonen J, Zederfeldt B. Healing of experimental colonic anastomoses I. Bursting strength of the colon after left colon resection and anastomosis. Am J Surg 1978;136:587–94.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dr. Thijs Hendriks Ph.D..

About this article

Cite this article

Hesp, F.L.E.M., Hendriks, T., Lubbers, EJ.C. et al. Wound healing in the intestinal wall. Dis Colon Rectum 27, 99–104 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553985

Download citation

Key words

  • Anastomosis
  • Intestine
  • Heal
  • Colonic
  • Hydroxyproline
  • Collagen
  • Bursting pressure
  • Wound healing
  • Rabbit