Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prospective studies of laboratory and radiologic tests in the management of colon and rectal cancer patients: I

Selection of useful preoperative tests through an analysis of surgically occult metastases

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

The laboratory and radiologic tests that give useful information in colon and rectal cancer patients over and above that obtained by routine work-up and surgical exploration of the abdomen have not been defined previously. An analysis of surgically occult metastases was used to discover which test would assist in the management of these patients. Occult metastases for radiologic tests were those occurring within one year after resection of the primary tumor; for CEA they were metastases occurring at any time following surgery. Full lung tomography, liver/spleen scan, computerized tomogram of the abdomen, intravenous pyelogram, bone scan, and postoperative baseline CEA greater than 2.5 ng/ml were analyzed. The postoperative baseline CEA was the most sensitive test detecting occult metastases in 57 per cent (12 out of 21) of a high risk patient population. Both postoperative baseline CEA and computerized tomograms of the abdomen had high positive predictive values of 71 and 67 per cent. The negative predictive percentage of computerized tomograms of the abdomen (18 per cent) was lower than that of CEA (21 per cent). In comparing these tests in individual patients with occult recurrence, postoperative CEA and computerized tomograms of the abdomen were seen to be complementary in that approximately 90 per cent of occult metastases were detected when both examinations were used. Computerized tomogram of the abdomen and postoperative baseline CEA are useful in patients with primary colorectal cancer as part of their routine work-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sugarbaker PH, Vineyard GC, Lewicki AM, et al. Colonoscopy in the management of diseases of the colon and rectum. Surgery 1974;139:341–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eisman B, Robinson WS, Steele G. Follow-up of the cancer patient. New York: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McNeil BJ, Adelstein J. Determining the value of diagnostic and screening tests. J Nucl Med 1976;17:439–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Finlay IG, McArdle CS. Effect of occult hepatic metastases on survival after curative resection for colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 1983;85:596–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wanebo HJ, Rao B, Pinsky CM, et al. Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as a prognostic indicator in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 1978;299:448–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kemeny MM, Sugarbaker PH, Smith TJ, et al. A prospective analysis of laboratory tests and imaging studies to detect hepatic lesions. Ann Surg 1982;195:163–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Phillips RKS, Hittinger R, Fielding LP. Preoperative urography in large bowel cancer surgery. A useless investigation? J Exp Clin Cancer Res 1983;2:55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Gianola, F.J., Dwyer, A., Jones, A.E. et al. Prospective studies of laboratory and radiologic tests in the management of colon and rectal cancer patients: I. Dis Colon Rectum 27, 811–818 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553945

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553945

Key words

Navigation