Abstract
Extraperitoneal colorectal anastomoses were constructed in dogs by four methods: one layer of sutures (N=10), two layers of sutures (N=10), EEA staples (N=10), and SPTU staples (N=10). Dehiscence occurred in eight sutured and one stapled anastomosis (P<0.05). The four leaks following two layer sutured anastomoses caused three deaths, whereas all four leaks following one-layer sutured anastomoses were only detected radiologically (P<0.02). In the stapled group, the single leak followed EEA anastomosis and was fatal. Anastomotic narrowing was greater in sutured than stapled groups (P<0.05). Two layers of sutures produced gross narrowing compared with one layer (P<0.002). Two rows of staples (EEA) produced more narrowing than one row (SPTU) (P<0.01). Mean hydroxyproline concentrations and bursting pressures on the seventh postoperative day were higher in stapled than sutured anastomoses (P<0.05). Submucosal alignment, mucosal continuity, tissue viability, and stage of healing were all inferior for two-layer sutured anastomoses, reaching statistical significance for tissue viability (P<0.05). Stapled anastomoses were completed significantly faster (32.6±7.3 minutes) than sutured (54.1±8.4 minutes) (P<0.01). This experimental study has demonstrated that stapling is a fast and reliable method of colorectal anastomosis with a low complication rate. The shortcomings of the standard two-layer sutured anastomosis are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, et al. Anastomotic integrity after operation for large bowel cancer: a multicentre study. Br Med J 1980;281:411–4.
Goligher JC, Morris C, McAdam WA, et al.. A controlled trial of inverting versus everting intestinal suture in clinical large bowel surgery. Br J Surg 1970;57:817–22.
Everett WG. A comparison of one layer and two layer techniques for colorectal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1975;62:135–40.
Woessner JF Jr. Determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of the amino acid. Arch Biochem Biophys 1961;93:440–7.
Goligher JC, Lee PW, Macfie J, Simpkins KC, Lintott DJ. Experience with the Russian model 249 suture gun for anastomosis of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1979;148:517–24.
McAdam AJ, Meikle AG, Taylor JO. One layer or two layer colonic anastomoses. Am J Surg 1970;120:546–50.
Andalkar RR. Comparative study, of stapled versus sutured anastomosis in low anterior resection. J Maine Med Assoc 1979;70:429–31.
Bubrick MP, Lundeen JW, Hitchcock CR. A comparative radiographic study of low anterior colon anastomoses in dogs. Surgery 1981;89:454–9.
Overy RD, Godfrey PJ, Evans M, et al. Staples or sutures in the colon? A random controlled trial of three methods of colonic anastomosis. Br J Surg 1980;67:363–4.
Beart RW, Kelly KA. Randomized prospective evaluation of the EEA stapler for colorectal anastomoses. Am J Surg 1981;141:143–7.
Matheson NA, Irving AD. Single layer anastomosis after rectosigmoid resection. Br J Surg 1975;62:239–42.
Orr NWM. A single layer intestinal anastomosis. Br J Surg 1969; 56:771–4.
Smith LE. Anastomosis with EEA stapler after anterior colonic resection (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1981;24:236–46.
Blamey SL, Lee PW. A comparison of circular stapling devices for colorectal anastomoses. Br J Surg 1982;69:19–22.
Keane FB, Moore DJ, Byrne PJ, Hennessy TP. A comparison of circular stapling devices for rectal anastomoses: a study in dogs. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:285–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Templeton, J.L., McKelvey, S.T.D. Low colorectal anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 28, 38–41 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553905
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553905