Skip to main content

Reliability of colonoscopy


In an effort to determine the reliability of colonoscopy the authors retrospectively reviewed preoperative colonoscopic findings and compared them with the postoperative pathologic specimen reports. Only lesions greater than 0.5 cm were included in the comparison. Over a 13-year period, 429 patients with colorectal cancer underwent preoperative colonoscopy. Four hundred thirteen (97 percent) of the colonoscopic examinations correlated with the pathologic specimen, but, in 16 cases (3 percent), lesions were missed. In total, 17 adenomatous polyps and 3 cancers were found in the surgical specimens that were not documented at colonoscopy. Eighteen patients had total preopecative colonoscopy and total abdominal colectomy, which makes for a reliable model to judge the accuracy of colonoscopy. In these 18 patients, 17 of the pathologic specimens correlated with the endoscopic findings, which yields an accuracy rate of 94 percent. Blind areas in the colon, plus misjudgment that the scope had reached the cecum, are responsible for the majority of colonoscopic errors

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


  1. Wolff WI, Shinya H, Geffen A, et al. Comparison of colonoscopy and contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal disease. Am J Surg 1975:129:181–6.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reilly JC, Rusin LC, Theuerkauf FJ Jr. Colonoscopy: its role in cancer of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 1982:25:523–8.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Williams C, Hoexter B, Anderson MJ. Evaluation of the colonoscopic examination: results of three studies (symposium). Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:366–73.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Laufer I, Neville CW, Smith MD. The radiological demonstration of colorectal polyps undetected by endoscopy. Gastroenterology 1976;70:167–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Leiniske JL, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, et al. A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colon. Gastrointest Radiol 1977;2:125–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Thoeni RF, Petras A. Double-contrast barium enema examination and endoscopy in the detection of polypoid lesions in the cecum and ascending colon. Radiology 1982;144:257–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams JS. A hard look at colonoscopy. Am J Surg 1977;133:111–5.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


About this article

Cite this article

Byrd, R.L., Whitney Boggs, H., Slagle, G.W. et al. Reliability of colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 32, 1023–1025 (1989).

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Key words

  • Colonoscopy
  • Reliability
  • Missed polyp
  • Missed cancer