Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 411–417 | Cite as

Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude

  • Clinton T. Rubin
  • Lance E. Lanyon
Laboratory Investigations


Thein vivo remodeling behavior within a bone protected from natural loading was modified over an 8-week period by daily application of 100 consecutive 1 Hz load cycles engendering strains within the bone tissue of physiological rate and magnitude. This load regime resulted in a graded dose:response relationship between the peak strain magnitude and change in the mass of bone tissue present. Peak longitudinal strains below 0.001 were associated with bone loss which was achieved by increased remodeling activity, endosteal resorption, and increased intra-cortical porosis. Peak strains above 0.001 were associated with little change in intra-cortical remodeling activity but substantial periosteal and endosteal new bone formation.

Key words

Bone remodeling Mechanical strain Osteoporosis Bone mass 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Donaldson CL, Hulley SB, Vogel JM, Hattner RS, Bayers JH, McMillan DE (1970) Effect of prolonged bedrest on bone mineral. Metabolism 19:1071–1084PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith MC, Rambaut PC, Vogel JM Whittle MW (1977) Bone mineral measurement—experiment M078. In: Biomedical records from Skylab, NASA Publication, pp 183–190Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jones HH, Priest JD, Hayes WC, Tichenor CC, Nagel A (1977) Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise. J Bone Joint Surg 59-A:205–208Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Uhthoff HK, Jaworski ZFG (1978) Bone loss in response to long-term immobilisation. J Bone Joint Surg 60-B:420–429Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Woo SL-Y, Kuei SC, Amiel D, Gomez MA, Hayes WC, White FC, Akeson WH (1981) The effect of prolonged physical training on the properties of long bone. A study of Wolff's law. J Bone Joint Surg 63-A:780–787Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krolner B, Toft B, Nielsen SP, Tondevold E (1983a) Physical exercise as prophylaxis against involutional vertebral bone loss: a controlled trial. Clin Sci 64:541–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krolner B, Toft B (1983b) Vertebral bone loss: an unheeded side effect of therapeutic bed rest. Clin Sci 64:537–540PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lanyon LE (1976) The measurement of bone strain in vivo. Acta Orthop Belgica, Vol. 42 (suppl) 1:98:108Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rubin CT, Lanyon LE (1984) Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg 66A:397–402Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hert J, Liskova M, Landa J Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli. Part 1. Continuous and intermittent loading of tibia in rabbit. Folia Morph (Praha) 19:290–300Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Churches AE, Howlett CR, Waldron KJ, Ward GW (1980) The response of living bone to controlled time varying loading: method and preliminary results. J Biomechanics 13:203–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lanyon LE, Rubin CT (1984) Static versus dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomechanics 12:897–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lanyon LE, Smith RN (1970) Bone strain in the tibia during normal quadrupedal locomotion. Acta Orthop Scand 41:238–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Baggott DG, Lanyon LE (1977) An independent “postmortem” calibration of electrical resistance strain gauges bonded to bone surfaces in vivo. J Biomechanics 12:593–600Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O'Connor JA, Lanyon LE, MacFie H (1982) The influence of strain rate on adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomechanics 15:767–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lanyon LE, Goodship AE, Pye CJ, MacFie JH (1982) Mechanically adaptive bone remodelling. J Biomechanics 15:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Churches AE, Howlett CR (1981) The response of mature cortical bone to controlled time-varying loading. p 69–80 In: (ed) Cowin SC Mechanical properties of bone. ASME publication AMD-vol 45Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lanyon LE (1984) Functional strain, as a determinant for bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 36:S56-S61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Clinton T. Rubin
    • 1
  • Lance E. Lanyon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy and Cellular BiologyTufts UniversityBoston
  2. 2.The Royal Veterinary CollegeLondonUK

Personalised recommendations