Calcified Tissue International

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 340–344 | Cite as

Bone mineral content of the femoral neck and shaft: Relation between cortical and trabecular bone

  • H. Bohr
  • O. Schaadt
Clinical Investigations

Summary

Bone mineral content (BMC) of the femoral neck and shaft was determined with dual photon absorptiometry, using153Gd. Comparison of BMC with the amount of hydroxyapatite (HA) ofin vitro specimen showed correlation coefficients of 0.992 and 0.996 for the femoral neck and shaft respectively. In the femoral neck the amount of cortical bone in a bone section varies from 16% ash weight in the proximal part of 71% in the distal part. Corresponding to the site of BMC measurements, the cortical bone constitutes 57% in the femoral neck and 95% in the femoral shaft. The precision error of measurements of BMCin vivo, expressed as the coefficient of variation for repeated determinations, was 1.4% for the femoral neck and 1.3% for the femoral shaft. In the femoral neck it is possible to distinguish between structures consisting mainly of cortical bone and structures containing mostly trabecular bone. While the cortical bone value decreases only slowly with age in normal women, corresponding to BMC of the femoral shaft, the trabecular bone value decreases rapidly even compared with BMC of the femoral neck. Despite the significant correlation between the values for cortical and trabecular bone a distinction seems essential from a clinical point of view.

Key words

Bone mineral content Femoral neck Femoral shaft Cortical bone Trabecular bone 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Roos BO (1974) Dual photon absorptiometry in lumbar vertebrae. Thesis, Gothenburg, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wilson ChR, Madsen M (1977) Dichromatic absorptiometry of vertebral bone mineral content. Invest Radiol 12:180–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mazess BR (1979) Non-invasive measurement of bone. In: Barzel US (ed) Osteoporosis II, Grune & Stratton, New York, p 9Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krølner B, Pors Nielsen S (1980) Measurment of bone mineral content (BMC) of the lumbar spine. I. Theory and application of a new two-dimensional dual-photon attenuation method. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 40:653–663PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Mazess BR, Offord KP, Melton LJ (1981) Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging. J Clin Invest 67:328–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schaadt O, Bohr H (1982) Bone mineral content by dual photon absorptiometry. Accuracy-precision-sites of measurements. In: Dequeker JV, Johnston CC (eds) Non-invasive bone measurements methodological problems. IRL Press, Oxford, Washington DC, p 59–72Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bohr H, Schaadt O (1982) Influence of age on bone mineral content in the femoral neck, measured by dual photon absorptiometry. In: Dequeker JV, Johnston CC (eds) Non-invasive bone measurements, methodological problems. IRL Press, Oxford, Washington DC, pp 198–200Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dalén N, Jacobsen B (1974) Bone mineral assay: choice of measuring sites. Invest Radiol 9:174–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dunn WL, Wahner HW, Riggs BL (1980) Measurement of bone mineral content in human vertebrae and hip by dual photon absorptiometry. Radiology 136:485–487PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Riggs BL, Wahner HW, Seeman E, Offord KP, Dunn WL, Mazess RB, Johnson KA, Melton LJ (1982) Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. J Clin Invest 70: 716–723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schaadt O, Bohr H (1982) Loss of bone mineral in axial and periferal skeleton in aging, prednison treatment and osteoporosis. In: Dequeker JV, Johnston CC (eds) Non-invasive bone measurements, methodological problems. IRL Press, Oxford, Washington DC, p 207–214Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bohr H, Schaadt O (1983) Bone mineral content of femoral bone and the lumbar spine measured in women with fracture of the femoral neck by dual photon absorptiometry. Clin Orthop 179:240–245PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. Bohr
    • 1
  • O. Schaadt
    • 1
  1. 1.Bone Research Unit, Department of Medicine T, RigshospitaletUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations