Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 305–308 | Cite as

Iatrogenic perforation of the colon and rectum

  • Richard L. Nelson
  • Herand Abcarian
  • M. Leela Prasad
Article

Abstract

In eight years at Cook County Hospital, 42,000 barium enemas, 16,325 proctosigmoidoscopies, and 1207 colonoscopies were performed. All endoscopic procedures were done by the house staff. There were three perforations due to proctosigmoidoscopy, with one death; three perforations due to colonoscopy, with no deaths; and seven perforations due to barium enema, with no survivors. The adjuvant effect of barium sulfate is proposed as the most likely cause for this excessively high mortality in barium-enema perforation.

Key words

Perforation, iatrogenic colonic Proctosigmoidoscopy Colonoscopy Barium enema 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abcarian H, Lowe R. Colon and rectal trauma. Surg Clin North Am 1978 June; 58:519–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kunath U. Symptoms and treatment of iatrogenic rectum-colon perforation. Proctology 1979 Feb:30–6.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grodsky L. Perforation of the colon and rectum during administration of barium enema. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:216–25.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Filler D, Kunze HH, Tomak J. Barium peritonitis. Proctology 1980 Feb: 88–90.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levy MD, Hanna EA. Extraperitoneal perirectal extravasation of barium during a barium enema examination: natural course and treatment. Am Surg 1980;46:382–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kay S, Choy SH. Results of intraperitoneal injection of barium sulfate contrast medium: experimental study. Arch Pathol 1955;59:388–92.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halsted WS. Circular suture of the intestine—an experimental study. Am J Med Sci 1887;94:436–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hau T, Ahrenholz DH, Simons RL. Secondary bacterial peritonitis: the biologic basis of treatment. Curr Probl Surg 1979 Oct; 16:4–65.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sisel RJ, Donovan AJ, Yellin AE. Experimental fecal peritonitis: influence of barium sulfate or water-soluble radiographic contrast material on survival. Arch Surg 1972;104:765–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cochran DQ, Almond CH, Shucart WA. An experimental study of the effects of barium and intestinal contents on the peritoneal cavity. AJR 1963;89:883–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hullo A, Bret M, Perrot E, Berard P. Pronostic des perforations recto-coliques observées au cours de lavements simples ou barytés. Anesth Analg (Paris) 1977;34:169–92.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yudis M, Cohen A, Pearce AE. Peforation of the transverse colon during barium enema and air-contrast studies. Am Surg 1968;34:334–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kahn SP, Lindenauer SM, Wojtalik RS. Perforation of the normal colon during barium contrast examination. Am Surg 1976;42:789–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Nelson
    • 2
    • 1
  • Herand Abcarian
    • 2
    • 1
  • M. Leela Prasad
    • 2
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Abraham Lincoln School of MedicineUniversity of Illinois at the Medical CenterChicago
  2. 2.Section of Colon & Rectal SurgeryCook County HospitalChicago

Personalised recommendations