Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transverse colostomy in the management of cancer of the colon

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Summary

The indications, time factors, results and complications of the transverse colostomy when used at some time in the course of management of 45 patients with cancer of the large bowel are reviewed. The transverse colostomy is safe and effective for decompression, but when it was needed to alleviate acute obstruction only approximately half of the patients subsequently completed the three staged procedures. An average of 94 days was required for completion of the staged operations.

Significant complications are associated with closure of the transverse colostomy. The survival rate in 45 patients with cancer of the colon who had transverse colostomies was extremely poor—8.8 per cent survived five years. Colostomy closure was not achieved in 42 per cent of the patients.

It is suggested that when possible, reconsideration be given to Mikulicz resection for management of obstructing lesions of the proximal colon. When a transverse colostomy has been established to alleviate obstruction closure at the time of resection would be desirable, in view of the poor prognosis for these patients and in order to decrease hospitalization and the need for a further major surgical procedure, with its attendant risks and expense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albers, J. H., and L. L. Smith: A comparison of cecostomy and transverse colostomy in complete colon obstruction. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.95: 410, 1952.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne, J. J.: Large bowel obstruction. Amer. J. Surg.99: 168, 1960.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, W. Y. M., and W. E. Burnett: Complete colonic obstruction due to adenocarcinoma. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.114: 353, 1962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Floyd, C. E., and I. Cohn, Jr.: Obstruction in cancer of the colon. Ann. Surg.165: 721, 1967.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerber, A., R. J. Thompson, Jr., O. K. Reiswig, and R. S. Vannix: Experiences with primary resection for acute obstruction of the large intestine. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.115: 593, 1962.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hickey, R. C., and H. P. Hyde: Neoplastic obstruction of the large bowel. Surg. Clin. N. Amer.45: 1157, 1965.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hubbard, T. B., Jr., A. Norico, and R. A. Harris: Two stage resection of the colon. Surg. Gynec. Obstet.124: 1081, 1967.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Minster, J. J.: Comparison of obstructing and nonobstructing carcinoma of the colon. Cancer.17: 242, 1964.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Welch, C. E., and J. F. Burke: Carcinoma of the colon and rectum. New Eng. J. Med.266: 210, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Hopkins, J.E. Transverse colostomy in the management of cancer of the colon. Dis Colon Rectum 14, 232–236 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553192

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553192

Keywords

Navigation