Abstract
Forty-three consecutive specimens of resected rectal carcinomas, 16 abdominoperineal and 27 anterior resections, were examined for distal intramural spread. Thirty-four of the resections were considered curative and nine palliative. Eighteen carcinomas (42 percent) showed no distal spread, and 14 (33 percent) showed very limited distal spread (0–5 mm). In the remaining cases, 11 (25 percent) had distal spread of more than 5 mm and eight of more than 10 mm. The eight carcinomas with distal spread of greater than 10 mm were advanced Dukes' C tumors. Only three were considered curable. All potentially curable carcinomas would have been resected adequately with a distal margin of only 1.5 cm except one signet-ring carcinoma with extensive lymph node metastases located in the lower rectum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fain SN, Patin CS, Morgenstern L. Use of a mechanical suturing apparatus in low colorectal anastomosis. Arch Surg 1975; 110:1079–82.
Heald RJ. Towards fewer colostomies: the impact of circular stapling devices on the surgery of rectal cancer in a district hospital. Br J Surg 1980;67:198–200.
Clogg HS. Some observations on carcinoma of the colon. Practitioner 1904;72:525–44.
Black WA, Waugh JM. The intramural extension of carcinoma of the descending colon, sigmoid, and rectosigmoid: a pathologic study. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1948;87:457–64.
Quer EA, Dahlin DC, Mayo CW. Retrograde intramural spread of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid: a microscopic study. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1953;96:24–30.
Penfold JC. A comparison of restorative resection of carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum with abdominoperineal excision. Aust NZ J Surg 1974;44:354–6.
Williams NS, Dixon MF, Johnston D. Reappraisal of the 5 centimetre rule of distal excision for carcinoma of the rectum: a study of distal intramural spread and of patients' survival. Br J Surg 1983;70:150–4.
Dukes CE. Cancer of the rectum: an analysis of 1000 cases. J Pathol Bacteriol 1940;50:527–39.
Wood CB, Gillis CR, Hole D, Malcolm AJ, Blumgart LH. Local tumour invasion as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 1981;68:326–8.
Talbot IC, Ritchie S, Leighton MH, Hughes AO, Bussey HJ, Morson BC. The clinical significance of invasion of veins by rectal cancer. Br J Surg 1980;67:439–42.
Whittaker M, Goligher JC. The prognosis after surgical treatment for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 1976;63:384–8.
Handley WS. The surgery of the lymphatic system. Br Med J 1910;1:922–8.
Cole PP. The intramural spread of rectal carcinoma. Br Med J 1913;1:431–3.
Connell JF Jr, Rottino A. Retrograde spread of carcinoma in the rectum and rectosigmoid. Arch Surg 1949;59:807–13.
Grinnell RS. Distal intramural spread of carcinoma of the rectum and rectosigmoid. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1954;99:421–30.
Williams NS, Johnston D. Survival and recurrence after sphincter saving resection and abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br J Surg 1984;71:278–82.
Nicholls RJ, Ritchie JK, Wadsworth J, Parks AG. Total excision or restorative resection for carcinoma of the middle third of the rectum. Br J Surg 1979;66:625–7.
Localio SA, Eng K, Gouge TH, Ranson JH. Abdominosacral resection for carcinoma of the midrectum: 10 years experience. Ann Surg 1978;188:475–80.
Rich T, Gunderson LL, Lew R, Galdibini JJ, Cohen AM, Donaldson G. Patterns of recurrence of rectal cancer after potentially curative surgery. Cancer 1983;52:1317–29.
Luke M, Kirkegaard P, Lendorf A, Christiansen J. Pelvic recurrence rate after abdominoperineal resection and low anterior resection for rectal cancer before and after introduction of the stapling technique. World J Surg 1983;7:616–9.
Pollett WG, Nicholls RJ. The relationship between the extent of distal clearance and survival and local recurrence rates after curative anterior resection for carcinoma of the rectum. Ann Surg 1983;198:159–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Madsen, P.M., Christiansen, J. Distal intramural spread of rectal carcinomas. Dis Colon Rectum 29, 279–282 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553041
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553041