Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Suprapubic bladder drainage in elective colorectal surgery

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

Suprapubic bladder drainage was assessed in 399 patients, following surgery of the rectum and sigmoid colon. An Argyle-Ingram catheter no. 16 French was inserted after the laparotomy incision had been made. The bladder was drained continuously for 24 hours, after which the catheter was closed and reopened every 6 hours for 10 minutes. The catheter was removed when the postvoided volume became less than 50 ml on each of two subsequent measurements. Abdominoperineal excision required the longest drainage period. Urethral catheterization became necessary in 13 men and six women because of persistent or recurrent urinary retention. Failures of suprapubic drainage made urethral catheterization necessary in 17 of 31 patients. Uroperitoneum, due to leakage from the bladder after removal of the suprapubic catheter, was seen in one patient with infravesical obstruction and bladder diverticula. The patient recovered after relaparotomy and suture of the bladder. Suprapubic drainage is recommended because it permits spontaneous voiding. Urethral instrumentation is avoided in most cases. Residual volume can be measured without urethral catheterization. Complications are few, and discomfort to the patient is seen in no more than 1 percent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goligher JC. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5th ed. London: Bailliere Tindall, 1984:618.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Marks CG, Ritchie JK. The complications of synchronous combined excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum at St Mark's Hospital. Br J Surg 1975;62:901–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kramhoft J, Kronborg O, Backer OG, Sprechler M. Urologic complications after operations for anorectal cancer, with an evaluation of preoperative intravenous pyelography. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:118–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Christensen PB, Kronborg O. Suprapubic bladder drainage in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 1981;68:348–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rasmussen OV, Korner B, Møller-Sørensen P, Kronborg O. Suprapubic versus urethral bladder drainage following surgery for rectal cancer. Acta Chir Scand 1977;143:371–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Glass RL, Spratt JS. Urinary complications after abdominoperineal resection of the rectum in men. Am Surg 1968;34:238–41.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barham KA. Suprapubic bladder drainage in gynaecological surgery. Aust NZ J Surg 1973;43:32–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen JT, Heisterberg L, Hebjørn S, et al. Suprapubic versus transurethral bladder drainage after colposuspension/vaginal repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985;64:139–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Klaaborg, KE., Kronborg, O. Suprapubic bladder drainage in elective colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 29, 260–262 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02553032

Key words

Navigation