Abstract
Six episodes of contrast extravasation occurred in 5 patients during intravenous digital subtraction angiography in a period of 9 months. The extravasations were into the mediastinum (3), pericardium (1), and right atrial wall (2). These occurred using a variety of catheters, all the same size (5.0 F—1.67 mm). Three were Katzen catheters, one had a pigtail configuration, and two were straight catheters. We believe that the extravasations are due to three main factors. The first is catheter-related, owing to the small size (5.0 F) creating recoil and marked jet stream effect due to the large volume and pressure that must be delivered through the side holes. The second factor is related to positioning of the catheter in the superior vena cava. Finally, the respiratory phase at the time of injection becomes crucial. Understanding of these factors may help to decrease this potentially serious complication.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chilcote WA, Modic MT, Pavlicek WA, et al. (1981) DSA of the carotid arteries: A comparative study in 100 patients. Radiology 139:287–295
Crummy AB, Mistretta CA, Ruzicka FF, Jr. (1981) Digital video subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral vascular disease. Radiology 141:33–37
Hillman BJ, Ovitt TW, Nudelman S, et al. (1981) Digital video subtraction angiography of renal vascular abnormalities. Radiology 139:277–280
Saddekni S, SOS TA, Sniderman KW, et al. (1984) Optimal injection technique for intravenous digital subtration angiography. Radiology 150:655–659
Rosen RJ, Miller DL, DeFilipp (1983) Mediastinal extravasation during digital angiography. AJR 140:389–390
Kubal WS, Crummy AB, Turnipseed WD (1983) The utility of digital subtraction arteriography in peripheral vascular disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 6:241–249
Hessel SJ, Levy JM, Crowe JK, et al. (1983) Current experience with digital subtraction angiography in the community medical center. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 6:280–289
Harris RS, Giovannetti M, Kim BK (1983) Normal ventilatory movement of the right hemidiaphragm studied by ultrasonography and pneumotachography. Radiology 146:141–144
Fraser RG, Pare JAP (1977) The normal chest. In: Fraser RG, Pare JAP (eds) Diagnosis of diseases of the chest, 2nd Ed, Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 156–159
Smith JJ, Kampine JP (1981) Pressure and flow in the arterial and venous systems. In: Smith, JJ, Kampine JP (eds) Circulatory physiology—the essentials, 1st Ed, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 53–69
Guyton AC (1971) Pulmonary ventilation. In: Guyton AC (ed) Medical physiology, 4th Ed, Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 456–467
Smith JJ, Kampine JP (1981) Circulatory response to non-exercise stress. In: Smith JJ, Kampine JP (eds) Circulatory physiology—the essentials, 1st Ed, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 235–253
Junker JA, Totty WG, Stanley RJ, McClennan BL (1983) Computed-tomographic confirmation of femoral vein distension with Valsalva maneuver. Radiology 147:275
Mills SR, Jackson DC, Older RA, Heaston DK, Moore AV (1980) The incidence, etiologies, and avoidance of complications of pulmonary angiography in a large series. Radiology 136:295–299
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arbona, G.L., Verrill, A.D., Conrad, W.C. et al. Venous contrast extravasation during digital subtraction angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 8, 211–215 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552902
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552902