Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endorectal sliding flap repair of complicated anterior anoperineal fistulas

  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

This report presents experience with a safe and effective form of treatment for anal fistulas that involve a significant portion of the sphincter mechanism. The technique includes removal of the involved crypt, closure of the internal opening with a sliding endorectal flap, and counter drainage of the fistula tract. This series includes eight patients treated over a five-year period with a follow-up of up to five years. This limited series had no complications and one case of early recurrence. Most of these patients had had previous failed attempts at correction of the fistula. The main advantage of this mode of treatment is preservation of the integrity of the sphincter muscle, thus avoiding the high risk of incontinence that is inherent especially with anteriorly located fistulas in females. It is proposed that, because it does not transect the sphincter anteriorly, this technique is safer than the placement of setons, as has been previously advised for management of anterior fistulas. The different treatment techniques for anal fistulas, including complications, recurrence rates, surgical techniques, and indications for types of management are reviewed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Stitz RW. The treatment of high fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1976;19:487–99.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon PH. In: Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Roe J. Colon, rectal and anal surgery: current techniques and controversies. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1985:91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noble GH. A new operation for complete laceration of the perineum designed for the purpose of eliminating danger of infection from the rectum. Trans Am Gynecol Soc 1902;27:357–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mengert WF, Fish SA. Anterior rectal wall advancement: technique for repair of complete perineal laceration and rectovaginal fistula. Obstet Gynecol 1955;5:262–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rothenberger DA, Christensen CE, Balcos EG, et al. Endorectal advancement flap for treatment of simple rectovaginal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1982;25:297–300.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Buls JG, Rothenberger DA. In: Kodner IJ, Fry RD, Roe J. Colon, rectal and anal surgery: current techniques and controversies. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1985:63–75.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laird DR. Procedures used in treatment of complicated fistulas. Am J Surg 1948;76:701–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell TR, Gallagher DM. Low rectovaginal fistulas: approach and treatment. Am J Surg 1977;134:43–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Christensen A, Nilas L, Christiansen J. Treatment of transsphincteric anal fistulas by the seton technique. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:454–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Read at the meeting of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Houston, Texas, May 11 to 15, 1986.

About this article

Cite this article

Shemesh, E.I., Kodner, I.J., Fry, R.D. et al. Endorectal sliding flap repair of complicated anterior anoperineal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 31, 22–24 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552564

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552564

Key words

Navigation