Skip to main content
Log in

A survey of contrast media used in coronary angiography

  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, various contrast media have been developed for use in coronary angiography. These contrast media may be divided into ionic contrast media of high osmolality, those of low osmolality, and nonionic contrast materials. We conducted our own clinical studies with 40 patients. In random succession a standard contrast medium (ionic, of high osmolality) and a new-generation contrast medium (either nonionic or ionic with low osmolality) were injected into the right and left coronary arteries. After each injection we measured the systolic and diastolic blood pressure using a liquid-filled coronary catherter. In addition, the change in the length of the cardiac cycle was registered in terms of the R-R interval (in ms) and at the same time, leads I, II, and III of the ECG were recorded. We studied the influence of the various contrast media on the activity of ATPase in in vitro experiments, using Lasser and Lang's [30]. When ionic contrast media of low osmolality and nonionic contrast media were utilized the heart rate showed no change. Disturbances of rhythm such as ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation were not observed. All of the contrast media used produced the same ECG changes. These changes can be ascribed to the inhibition of ATPase. The arterial blood pressure was lowered significantly only by ionic contrast media of high osmolality only.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams DF, Fraser DB, Abrams HL (1973) The complications of coronary arteriography. Circulation 48:609–618

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aldo VE, Heeger H (1973) EKG-Veränderungen bei selektiver Koronarangiographie und Myokardszintingraphie. Z Kardiol 62:1078–1084

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey LE, Dresel PE (1968) Correlation of contractile force with a calcium pool in the isolated cat heart. J Gen Physiol 52:969–981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks DC, Raftery EB, Oram S (1969)_Evaluation of contrast media used in coronary arteriography. Br Heart J 31:645–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Benchimol A, McNally EM (1976) Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects of selective coronary arteriography in man. N Engl J Med 274:1217–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourassa MG, Noble J (1976) Complication rate of coronary arteriography. A review of 5250 cases studied by a percutaneous femoral technique. Circulation 53:106–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Björk L, Camrerini F, Larine GP (1969) Electrocardiographic changes during left heart and aortic angiocardiography with Urografin 76% and Isopaque 60%. Angiology 18:96–105

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brown TG Jr (1967) Cardiovascular actions of angiographic media. Angiology 18:273–281

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown TG Jr, Hoppe JO, Borisenok WA (1967) Cardiovascular studies of Isopaque B and other radiopaque media. Acta Radiol (Suppl) 270:58–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Carson RP, Weber WJ, Wilson WS (1969) Effect of selective coronary arteriography on myocardial blood flow in the intact dog. Am J Med Sci 257:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Carson RP, Lazzara R (1970) Hemodynamic responses initiated by coronary stretch receptors with special reference to coronary arteriography. Am J Cardiol 25:571–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Carter AM, Olin T (1975) Toxicity of roentgen contrast media at selective injection into the coronary artery in the rabbit. Invest Radiol 10:73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chahine RA, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1972) Complications of coronary arteriography: Comparison of the branchial to the femoral approach (abstr). Ann Intern Med 76:862

    Google Scholar 

  14. Coskey RL, Magidson O (1967) Electrocardiographic response to selective coronary arteriography. B Heart J 29:512–519

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eckberg DL, White CW, Kioschos JM, Abboud FM (1974) Mechanisms mediating bradycardia during coronary arteriography. J Clin Invest 54:1455–1461

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Eie H, Grendahl H, Nordvik A, Muëller C (1972) Electrocardiographic changes during selective coronary angiography. A comparison between Urografin 60% and Isopaque 2% without calcium ions. Acta Radiol [Diagn] 12:554–560

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ferńandez F, Scebat L, Lenègre J (1970) Electrocardiographic study of left intraventricular hemiblock in man during selective coronary arteriography. Am J Cardiol: 26:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friesinger GC, Schaeffer J, Criley M, Gaertner RA, Ross RS (1965) Hemodynamic consequences of the injection of radiopaque material. Circulation 31:730–790

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Frink RJ, Merrick B, Lowe HM (1975) Mechanism of the bradycardia during coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 35:17–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gensini GG, Dulbre J, Huntington PP, Kelly AE (1971) Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure before and after coronary arteriography: The value of coronary arteriography as a stress test. Am J Cardiol 27, 453–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gensini GG, DiGiori S (1964) Myocardial toxicity of contrast agents used in angiography. Radiology 82:24–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gootman N, Rudolph AM, Buckley NM (1980) Effects of angiographic contrast media on cardiac function. Am J Cardiol 25:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Grendahl H, Eie H, Nordvik A, Müller C (1972) Electrocardiographic changes during selective coronary angiography. Acta Med Scand 191:493–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Guzman SV, West JW (1969) Cardiac effects of intracoronary arterial injections of various roentgenographic contrast media. Am Heart J 38:597–607

    Google Scholar 

  25. Higgins CB, Schmidt W (1978) Direct and reflex myocardial effects of intracoronary administered contrast materials in the anesthetized and conscious dog. Comparison of standard and newer contrast material s. Invest Radiol 13:205–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hildner FJ, Scherlag B, Samet P (1971) Evaluation of Renografin M-76 as a contrast agent for angiocardiography. Radiology 100:329–334

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaftori JK, Paulin S (1974) The effect of pH on the toxicity of Diatrizoate in selective coronary arteriography. An experimental study in dogs. Invest Radiol 9:351–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaude JV, Lunderquist A, Persson A, Arnman K (1974) Selective coronary arteriography with Iodamide. A comparison of myocardial toxicity of two contrast media. Angiology 25:449–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kober G, Hopf R, Becker HJ, Kaltenbach M (1975) Wirkung und Nebenwirkungen der Kontrastmittel Urografin 76, Telebrix 300 und Telebrix 380 bei der selektiven Koronarangiographie des Menschen. Herz/Kreisl 7: 231–235

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lang J, Lasser LE (1975) Inhibition of adenosine triphosphatase and carbonic anhydrase by contrast media. Invest Radiol 10:314–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lehan PH, Harman A, Oldewurtel HA (1963) Myocardial water shifts induced by coronary arteriography (abstr). J Clin Invest 42:950

    Google Scholar 

  32. MacAlpin RN, Weidner WA, Kaltus AA, Hanafee WN (1966) Electrocardigraphic changes during selective coronary cineangiography. Circulation 34:627–637

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Maytin O, Castillo C, Castellanos A Jr (1970) The genesis of QRS changes produced by selective coronary arteriography. Circulation 41:247–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Nakhjavan FK, Smith AM, Dratch MB, Goldberg H (1974) His bundle electrogram during coronary arteriography in man: Studies at spontaneous and constant heart rates. J Electrocardiol 7:101–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Neuerburg-Heusler D, Zeitler E, Blümchen G (1975) Das Koronarangiographie-Elektrokardiogramm und seine Aussagefähigkeit. Herz Kreisl 7:285–296

    Google Scholar 

  36. Paulin S, Adams DF (1971) Increased ventricular fibrillation during coronary arteriography with a new contrast medium preparation. Radiology 101:45–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Reynolds G (1953) The electrocardiogram during angiocardiography. AJR 113:567–571

    Google Scholar 

  38. Smith RF, Hawthorne JW, Sanders CA (1967) Vectorcardiographic changes during intracoronary injections. Circulation 36:63–76

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Snyder CF, Formanek A, Frech RS, Amplatz K: The role of sodium in promoting ventricular arrhythmia during selective coronary arteriography AJR 113:567

  40. Talbert JL, Joyce EE, Sabiston DC Jr (1959) The effect of intra-arterial injection of radiopaque contrast media on coronary blood flow. Surgery 46:400–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Trägårdh B, Bove AA, Lynch PR (1974) Cardiac conduction abnormalities during coronary arteriography in dogs: Reduced effects of a new contrast medium. Invest Radiol 9:340–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Trägårdh B, Bove AA, Lynch PR (1976) Mechanism of production of cardiac conduction abnormalities due to coronary arteriography in dogs. Invest Radiol 11:563–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Trägårdh B, Lynch PR, Vinciguerra I (1976) Cardiac function during coronary arteriography with calcium enriched diatrizoate and metrizamide. Invest Radiol 11:569–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. White CW, Eckberg DL, Abboud FM (1972) Influence of contrast media on the sinus node (abstr 149). Circulation (Suppl 2) 45/46:38

    Google Scholar 

  45. White CW, Eckberg DL, Koschos JM, Abboud FM (1973) A study of coronary artery reflexes in man (abstr 253). Circulation (Suppl 4) 7/8:65

    Google Scholar 

  46. White CW, Eckberg DL, Inasaka T, Abboud FM (1976) Effects of angiographic contrast media on sino-atrial nodal function. Cardiovasc Res 10:214–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wien AE (1979) Elektrokardiographische Veränderungen während selektiver Koronarangiographie. Inauguraldissertation Erlangen FRG

  48. Weikl A (1981) Iopamidol in coronarografia. Radiol Med 67:Suppl 1, 398–401

    Google Scholar 

  49. Weikl A, Drust OE, Lang E (1975) Komplikationen der selektiven Koronarangiographie in Abhängigkeit von verwendeten Kontrastmitteln. ROEFO 123, 218–222

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Weikl A, Spitzer W, Durst OE, Lang E (1980) Kardiale Nebenwirkungen von Hexabrix bei der Koronarangiographie. Krankenhausarzt 53:541–548

    Google Scholar 

  51. Zipfel J, Baller D, Blanke H, Jonas W, Karsch KR, Rentrop P, Hellige G (1980) Die Reduktion der kardialen Nebenwirkungen ionischer Kontrastmittel bei der Koronarangiographie durch Kalziumzusatz. Klinische Studie. Z Kardiol 69:406–413

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Petetier A (1981) Congresso Nazionale Italiana di Radiologia Medica, Naples, p 250

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weikl, A., Hubmann, M. A survey of contrast media used in coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 5, 202–210 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552311

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552311

Key words

Navigation