Skip to main content
Log in

New technical trends in coronary laboratories

  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increasing experience and improvement of the techniques used in coronary angiography and left ventriculography, have advanced patient safety and the proper assessment of coronary heart disease. High-resolution image intensifiers, coupled with the use of 50 or 25 frames-per-second cinematography or 100 mm spot film technique, offer diverse possibilities for optimal documentation of the morphologic findings. For an evaluation of both hemodynamics and cinematography, computer-assisted units increasingly simplify work and offer greater safety in procedures that assess ventricular function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baltaxe H, Amplatz K, Levin D (eds) (1973) Coronary arteriography. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brundage BH, Farr JE (1978) Comparison of contrast medium and atrial pacing as tests of ventricular function in coronary artery disease. Br Heart J 40:250–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bunnel IL, Greene DG, Tandon RN, Arani DT (1973) The half-axial projection. A new look at the proximal left coronary artery. Circulation 48:1151–1156

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clayton PD, Bulawa WF, Urie PM, Marshall HW, Warner HR (1978) Quantitating left ventricular dynamics from single plane videometry. In: Heintzen PH, Bürsch HJ (eds) Roentgen-video-techniques for dynamic studies of structure and function of the heart and circulation. Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 203–213

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohn PF, Horn HR, Teichholz LE, Kreulen TH, Herman MV, Gorlin R (1973) Effects of angiographic contrast medium on left ventricular function in coronary artery disease. Comparison with static and dynamic exercise. Am J Cardiol 32:21–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohn PF, Gorlin R (1975) Dynamic, ventriculography and the role of ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol 36:529–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dodge HT, Tanenbaum HL (1956) Left ventricular volume in normal man and alteration with disease (abstr). Circulation 14:927

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dodge HT, Sandler H, Baxley WA, Hawley RR (1966) Usefulness and limitations of radiographic methods for determining left ventricular volume. Am J Cardiol 18:10–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Elliott LP, Bream PR, Soto B, Russel RO Jr, Rogers WJ, Mantle JA, Hood WP Jr (1981) Significance of the caudal-left-anterior oblique view in analyzing the left main coronary artery and its major branches. Radiology 139:39–43

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frank W (1977) Quantitative Auswertung der Links-Ventrikelangiographie. Therapiewoche 27:3722–3731

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gensini GG, Dubiel J, Huntington PP, Kelly AE (1971) Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure before and after coronary arteriography. The value of coronary arteriography as a stress test. Am J Cardiol 27:453–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Grüntzig A, Fischer M, Goebel N, Schlumpf M (1981) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Study of 147 patients. Ann Radiol 24:377–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Harris LD, Clayton PD, Marshall HW, Warner HR (1974) A technique for the detection of asynergistic motion in the left ventricle. Comput Biomed Res 7:380–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hegemann G, von der Emde J (1973) Die Indikation zur Koronarchirurgie. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 98:1506–1508

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herman MV, Heinle RA, Klein MD, Gorlin R (1967) Localized disorders in myocardial contraction. Asynergy and its role in congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 277:222–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hilal SK (ed) (1973) Imaging, morphology, physiology, and clinical applications. Small vessel angiography. CV Mosby, St Louis

    Google Scholar 

  17. Judkins MP (1967) Selective coronary arteriography. Part I. A percutaneous transfemoral approach. Radiology 89:815–824

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kreutzer H, Neuhaus KL, Schmiel FK, Spiller P (1975) Röntgenologische Funktionsdiagnostik bei koronarer Herzerkrankung. Verh Dtsch Ges Kreislaufforsch 41:54–65

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lichtlen PR (1979) Koronarangiographie. Perimed, Erlangen, FRG

    Google Scholar 

  20. Margolis JR, Chen JTT, Kong Y, Peter RH, Behar VS, Kisslo JA (1980) The diagnostic and prognostic significance of coronary artery calcification. Radiology 137:609–616

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Miller RA, Warkenrin DL, Felix WG, Hashemian M, Leighton RF (1980) Angulated views in coronary angiography. AJR 134:407–412

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pfeiler M, Niepel J (1973) New high-resolution image intensifiers and their suitability for coronary angiography. In: Hilal SK (ed) Small vessel angiography. CV Mosby, St Louis, pp 481–494

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rentrop P (1981) Recanalization of coronary arteries in acute myocardial infarction. Ann Radiol 24:357–359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sones FM, Shirey EK (1962) Cine coronary arteriography. Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis 31:735–738

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sos TA, Baltaxe HA (1977) Cranial and caudal angulation for coronary angiography revisited. Circulation 56: 119–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zeitler E, Schoop W, Dembsky JC, Scharf-Bornhofen E, Blümchen G (1965) Selective coronary arteriography. VASA 4:133–145

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zeitler, E., Richter, EI. & Seyferth, W. New technical trends in coronary laboratories. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 5, 145–153 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552301

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552301

Key words

Navigation