International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 29, Issue 6, pp 681–686

Urethral advancement and glanuloplasty UAGP vs. MAGPI for distal hypospadias repair

  • A. J. Jawad


Distal hypospadias is a commonly encountered anomaly. Since its innovation by Duckett the MAGPI procedure has become almost the standard operation for the correction of minor cases. Recently case selection has been advised to avoid possible complications and limitations. Between April 1986 and April 1995, 153 boys were treated for distal hypospadias. In 51 patients (coronal 31, subcoronal 20) a modified technique of urethral advancement and glanuloplasty (UAGP) has been used. The main indications of UAGP were the presence of glanular chordee (7), failed MAGPI (3), circumcised children with distal hypospadias (7), immobile fibrotic urethral meatus (5), and as an alternative to MAGPI (29). The overall complication rate was 4% compared to 3.8% with the MAGPI procedure which has been used in the treatment of 102 patients (glanular 50, coronal 47, and subcoronal 5). We feel this technique can be used effectively in patients with coronal and subcoronal hypospadias, particularly in the presence of distal chordee, fibrotic immobile urethral meatus or MAGPI limitations. Also UAGP could be a useful alternative to MAGPI where tension-free urethral advancement and glanular wrapping can be achieved.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sweet, R. A., Schrott, H. G., Kurland, R., Culp, O. S.: Study of the incidence of hypospadias in Rochester Minnesota, 1940–1970 and a case control comparison of possible etiologic factors.Mayo Clin. Proc., 49, 52 (1974).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duckett, J. W.: MAGPI (Meatoplasty and Glanuloplasty): A procedure for subcoronal hypospadias.Urol. Clin. North. Am., 8, 513 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caione, P., Capozza, N., De Genarro, M., Lais, A.: Distal urethral advancement and glanuloplasty for distal hypospadias: Preliminary results.Br. J. Urol., 68 (6), 650 (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heusle, T. W., Badillo, F., Burbige, K. A.: Experience with the MAGPI hypospadias repairs.J. Pediatr. Surg., 18 (6), 692 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Issa, M. M., Gearhart, K.: The failed MAGPI: Management and prevention.Br. J. Urol., 64, 169 (1989).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Devine, C. J. Jr., Horton, C. E.: Hypospadias repair.J. Urol., 118, 188 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    King, L. R.: Cutaneous chordee and its implications in hypospadias repair.Urol. Clin. North. Am., 8, 397 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Koff, S. A.: Mobilization of the urethra in the surgical treatment of hypospadias.J. Urol., 125, 394 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mathieu, P.: Traitement en un temps de l'hypospadias balanique et juxtabalanique.J. Chirurgie, 39, 481 (1932).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ozen, H. A., Whitaker, R. H.: Scope and limitations of the MAGPI hypospadias repair.Br. J. Urol., 59, 81 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duckett, J. W., Snyder, H. M.: Meatal advancement and glanuloplasty hypospadias repair after 1000 cases: Avoidance of meatal stenosis and regression.J. Urol., 147, 665 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barlas, M., Dindar, H., Cakmak, M., Yucesan, S.: Distal penile hypospadias repair in children, with complete mobilization of pendulous urethra and triangular glanular flap.Br. J. Urol., 75, 94 (1995).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Jawad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Division of Paediatric SurgeryKing Saud University College of MedicineRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations