Skip to main content
Log in

Changing patient and stone features for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in Turkey

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has made a revolution in the treatment of urolithiasis. Recent reports suggesting that stone features for SWL have changed during the last years have forced us to compare our initial and last 250 patients treated at our ESWL unit in terms of stone and patient characteristics. We found that the number of ureteric stones and small calyceal stones have increased significantly with time whereas the number of larger stones undergoing SWL has decreased significantly. We believe that this change in stone features is caused by the changing trends in the treatment of stone disease by incorporating other therapeutic options and modifying the SWL indications according to patient characteristics. We also believe that prophylactic lithotripsy for asymptomatic calyceal stones still remains to be a debatable issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaussy, C. H., Brendel, W., Schmiedt, E.: Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.Lancet, 2, 1265 (1980).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chaussy, C. H., Schmiedt, E., Jocham, D., Brendel, W., Forssmann, B., Walther, V.: First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves.J. Urol., 127, 417 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Assimos, D. G., Boyce, W. H., Harrison, L. H., McCullough, D. L., Kroovand, R. L., Sweat K. R.: Role of open surgery since extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J. Urol., 142, 263 (1989).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyle, E. T., Segura, J. W., Patterson, D. E., Le Roy, A. J., Rochester, M. N.: The role of open stone surgery in stone disease.J. Urol., 141, 293 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Descant, N., Thomas, R.: Are criteria for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) changing in United States?J. Urol., 149, 365A. AUA 88. Annual Meeting, May 15–20, 1993.

  6. Ilker, Y., Alican, Y., Şimşek, F., Türkeri, L. N., Akdaş, A.: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy of staghorn calculi with Dornier MFL 5000.J. Endourol., 7, 281 (1993).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cass, A. S.: Changing pattern of stone treatment by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. 11th World Congress on Endourology and ESWL, October 20–23, 1993, p. XVI-1.

  8. Hübner, W., Porpaczy, P.: Treatment of caliceal calculi.Br.J. Urol., 66, 9 (1990).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Glowacki, L. S., Beecroft, M. L., Cook, R. J., Pahl, D., Churchill, D. N.: The natural history of asymptomatic urolithiasis.J. Urol., 147, 319 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lam, H. S., Lingeman, J. E., Mosbaugh, P. G., Steele, R. E., Knapp, P. M., Scott, J. W., Newman, D. M.: Evolution of the technique of combination therapy for staghorn calculi: A decreasing role for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.J. Urol., 148, 1058 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lingeman, J. E.: Staghorn calculi: Percutaneous versus ESWL treatment.Prob. Urol., 6, 346 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ilker, Y., Tarcan, T., Şimşek, F. et al. Changing patient and stone features for shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in Turkey. International Urology and Nephrology 27, 663–668 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552129

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02552129

Keywords

Navigation