Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of inguinal and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of varicocele

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To determine the pros and cons of inguinal and laparoscopic varix ligation techniques, we reviewed 53 patients who underwent inguinal (n=35) and laparoscopic (n=18) varicocelectomy at two centers. Intraoperative complications were not observed in either of the groups. There was 1 recurrence and 1 persistence in the laparoscopically treated patients. The inguinal approach had the advantage of shorter operating time (19.1 versus 52.8 min), ability to ligate the external spermatic veins, and it could be performed as an outpatient procedure. However, the laparoscopic approasch seemed superior for preserving the spermatic artery (88.8% versus 68.5%) and had lesser postoperative morbidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Saypol, D. C.: Varicocele,J. Androl., 2, 61 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dubin, L., Amelar, R. D.: Varicocelectomy: 986 cases in a twelve-year study.Urology, 10, 446 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pryor, J. L., Howard, S. S.: Contemporary Management of Impotence and Infertility. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ivanissewich, O.: Left varicocele due to reflux: Experience with 4,470 operative cases in forty-two years.J. Int. Coll. Surg., 34, 745 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palomo, A.: Radical cure of varicocele by a new technique: Preliminary report.J. Urol., 61, 604 (1949).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kaufman, S. L., Kadir, S., Barth, K. H., Smyth, J. W., Walsh, P. C., White, R. I. Jr.: Mechanisms of recurrent varicocele after balloon occlusion or surgical ligation of the internal spermatic vein.Radiology, 147, 435 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ports, H., Böhren, W., Lenz, M., Altwein, J. E.: Percutaneous sclerotherapy of varicoceles—An alternative to conventional surgical methods.Br. J. Urol., 56, 73 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Winfield, H. N., Donovan, J. F., See, W. A., Loening, S. A., Williams, R. D.: Urological laparoscopic surgery.J. Urol., 146, 941 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Matsuda, T., Horii, Y., Higashi, S., Oishi, K., Takeuchi, H., Yoshida, O.: Laparoscopic varicocelectomy: A simple technique for clip ligation of the spermatic vessels.J. Urol., 147, 636 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lynch, W. J., Badenoch, D. F., Mc Anena, O. J.: Comparison of laparoscopic and open ligation of the testicular vein.Br. J. Urol., 72, 796 (1993).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mishinger, H. J., Colombo, T., Rauchenwald, M., Altziebler, S., Steiner, H., Vilits, P., Hubner, G.: Laparoscopic procedure for varicocelectomy.Br. J. Urol., 74, 112 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ralph, D. J., Timoney, A. G., Parker, C., Pryor, J. P.: Laparoscopic varicocele ligation.Br. J. Urol., 72, 230 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray, R. R., Mitchell, S. E., Kadir, S., Kaufman, S. L., Chang, R., Kinnison, M. L., Smyth, J. W., White, R. I. Jr.: Comparison of recurrent varicocele anatomy following surgery and percutaneous balloon occlusion.J. Urol., 135, 286 (1986).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Levitt, S., Gill, B., Katlowitz, N., Kogan, S. J., Reda, E.: Routine intraoperative postligation venography in the treatment of the pediatric varicocele.J. Urol., 137, 716 (1987).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sayfan, J., Adam, Y. G., Soffer, Y.: A new entity in varicocele subfertility: the cremasteric reflux.Fertil. Steril., 33, 88 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Belgrano, E., Puppo, P., Qattrini, S., Trombetta, C., Guiliani, L.: The role of venography and sclerotherapy in the management of varicocele.Eur. Urol., 10, 124 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Poulsen, E. U., Willumsen, H., Colstrup, H., Jensen, K. M.: Varicocele of the testis. A comparison between laparoscopic and conventional surgery.Ugeskrift for laeger, 156, 5683 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Enquist, E., Stein, B. S., Sigman, M.: Laparoscopic versus subinguinal varicocelectomy: A comparative study.Fertil. Steril., 61, 1092 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Mac Mahon, R. A., O'Brien, M. C., Cussen, L. J.: The use of microsurgery in the treatment of the undescended testis.J. Pediatr. Surg., 11, 521 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Silber, S. J.: Microsurgery. Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Fowler, R., Stephans, F. D.: Congenital Malformations of the Rectum, Anus and Genitourinary tracts. Livingstone, Edinburgh 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jarrow, J. P., Assimus, D. G., Pittiway, D. E.: Effectiveness of laparoscopic varicocelectomy.Urology, 42, 544 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Szabo, R., Kessler, R.: Hydrocele following internal spermatic vein ligation: A retrospective study and review of the literature.J. Urol., 132, 924 (1984).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. V. Ülker

    Present address: Department of Urology, Ege University Hospital, Bornova 35100, Izmir, Turkey

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    V. Ülker, H. Garibyan & K. -H. Kurth

Authors
  1. V. Ülker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. Garibyan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. K. -H. Kurth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ülker, V., Garibyan, H. & Kurth, K.H. Comparison of inguinal and laparoscopic approaches in the treatment of varicocele. International Urology and Nephrology 29, 71–77 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551420

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02551420

Keywords

Search

Navigation