Skip to main content
Log in

Psychosomatic evaluation of patients with congenital penile deviation. A postoperative catamnestic follow-up

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thirty-three patients with congenital penile deviation were examined by a semistructured interview and psychodiagnostic tests (Gießen test, Gießen complaint sheet) prior to undergoing surgery according to the Nesbit-Kelâmi technique [7]. A prognosis was then made to determine the extent to which the problems and disturbances reported by the patient or uncovered by the examiner could be improved by the operation. This prognostic assessment was then verified in a subsequent catamnestic examination (N=20), at an average of 21.3 months after the intervention.

An attempt is made to identify and define preoperative indicators that permit to predict the postoperative course.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dosuzkov, Th.: Zur Frage der Dysmorphophobie.Psyche, 23, 683 (1969).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eicher, W., Herms, V., Hüter, J., Kubli, F.: Psychologische Aspekte bei plastischer Chirurgie der Mamma.Fortschr. Med., 92, 1407 (1974).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill, G., Silver, A. G.: Psychodynamic and esthetic motivations for plastic surgery.Psychosomat. Med., 12, 345 (1950).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huenecke, P., Bosse, K.: Dysmorphophobia as casus pro diagnosis.Z. Hautkr., 60, 86 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kelâmi, A.: Classification of congenital and acquired penile deviation.Urol. Int., 35, 229 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kelâmi, A.: Klinik und Praxis: Penisdeviation.Urologe [A],24, 160 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kelâmi, A.: Congenital penile deviation and its treatment with the Nesbit-Kelâmi technique.Br. J. Urol., 69, 261 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Küchenhoff, J.: Dysmorphophobie.Nervenarzt, 55, 122 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mester, H.: Der Wunsch einer Frau nach Veränderung der Busengröß—Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Dysmorphophobie.Z. Psychosom. Med., 28, 69 (1982).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer, E.: Motivational patterns in patients seeking elective plastic surgery.Psychosom. Med., 22, 193 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Myron, L., Belfer, M., Mulliken, J. B., Cochran, Th. C. Jr.: Cosmetic surgery as an antecedent of life change.Am. J. Psychiat., 136, 199 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neumann, A.: Dysmorphophobie: Ein Erfahrungsbereich aus der chirurgischen Spezialsprechstunde.Handchirurgie, 19, 134 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rechenberger, K., Molinski, H.: Psychische und körperliche Reaktionen nach kosmetischen Brustoperationen.Fortschr. Med., 17, 1129 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Roubicek, A.: Zur Psychopathologie der kosmetischen Fehler, besonders jener der Gesichtsbildung.Med. Kosmetik, 9 21 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schepank, H.: Beeinträchtigungsschwerescore. In: Psychogene Erkrankungen der Stadtbevölkerung. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Strain, F.: Die Dysmorphophobie als Kontraindikation kosmetischer Operationen.Handchirurgie, 16, 193 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keller, W., Köpp, W., Wunder, B. et al. Psychosomatic evaluation of patients with congenital penile deviation. A postoperative catamnestic follow-up. International Urology and Nephrology 24, 439–446 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550639

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550639

Keywords

Navigation