Skip to main content
Log in

Spermatozoa selection by the swim-up procedure and two-layer percoll gradient centrifugation

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficiency of the swim-up procedure and two-layer Percoll gradient centrifugation in procession of spermatozoa was assessed in ejaculates from 47 infertile men. A significantly higher total number of spermatozoa was harvested from Percoll gradients than from the swim-up procedure, the loss rates in concentration being −13.6±6.4% and −70.8±5.8%, respectively (p<0.0001). Recovery in per cent motility was significantly higher after the Percoll gradient than after the swim-up procedure (34.8±10.2% versus −10.4±17.2%, p<0.05). No significant difference was noted between the mean motility grades of the final solutions obtained by the two methods (2.7±0.2 and 2.0±0.4, respectively, p>0.05). When evaluation was conducted within three initial fresh sample concentration categories such as severe oligospermia (lower than 5×106/ml), moderate oligospermia (5 to 10×106/ml) and mild oligospermia (higher than 10×106/ml), the Percoll technique recovered, significantly higher number of spermatozoa than the swim-up procedure through all concentration categories (p<0.05 for each range). Despite being statistically insignificant, Percoll gradients produced final spermatozoa pools with higher per cent motility and motility quality within all concentration ranges. The results suggest that the Percoll gradient centrifugation should be the preferred selection method regardless of the initial fresh sample concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Perry, G., Glezerman, M., Insler, V.: Selective filtration of abnormal spermatozoa by the cervical mucus in vitro. In: V. Insler, G. Bettendorf (eds): The Uterine Cervix in Reproduction. George Thieme Publishers, Stuttgart 1977, p. 188.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harris, S. J., Milligan, M. P., Masson, G. M., Dennis, K. J.: Improved separation of motile sperm in asthenospermia and its application to artificial insemination homologous (AIH).Fertil. Steril., 36, 219 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steeno, O., Adimoelja, A., Steeno, J.: Separation of x- and Y-bearing human spermatozoa with Sephadex gel filtration method.Andrologia, 7, 95 (1975).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harris, R. A. P.: A highly efficient method for washing mammalian spermatozoa.J. Reprod. Fertil., 48, 347 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lopata, A., Patullo, M. J., Chang, A., James, B.: A method for collecting motile spermatozoa from human semen.Fertil. Steril., 27, 677 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gorus, F. K., Pipeleers, D. G.: A rapid method for the fractionation of human spermatozoa according to their progressive motility.Fertil. Steril., 35, 662 (1981).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, F. N., Hong, C. Y., Chou, T. S., Hsiung, C. H., Karow, W. G., Pesic, M. C.: Techniques for selection of normal chromatin sperm preparations.Arch. Androl., 27 (2), 87 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morales, P., Vantman, D., Barros, C., Vigil, P.: Human spermatozoa selection by Percoll gradient or swim-up are equally capable of binding to the human zona pellucida and undergoing the acrosome reaction.Hum. Reprod., 6 (3), 401 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Englert, Y., Van den Bergh, M., Rodesch, C., Bertrand, E., Biramane, J., Legreve, A.: Comparative auto-controlled study between swim-up and Percoll preparation of fresh semen samples for in vitro fertilization.Hum. Reprod., 7 (3), 399 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ng, F. L., Liu, D. Y., Baker, H. W.: Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples.Hum. Reprod., 7 (2), 261 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bollendorf, A., Check, J. H., Katsoff, D., Lurie, D.: Comparison of direct swim-up, mini-Percoll and Sephadex G 10 separation procedures.Arch. Androl., 32 (2), 157 (1994).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerin, J. F., Mathieu, C., Lornage, J., Pinatel, M. C., Boulieu, D.: Improvement of survival and fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa in an IVF programme by selection on discontinuous Percoll gradients.Hum. Reprod., 4 (7), 798 (1989).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McClure, R. D., Nunes, L., Tom, R.: Semen manipulation, improved sperm recovery and function with a two-layer Percoll gradient.Fertil. Steril., 51 (5), 874 (1989).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sapienza, F., Verhegen, G., Tournage, H., Janssen, R., Pletincx, I., Derde, M., Van Steirteghem, A.:Hum. Reprod., 8 (11); 1956 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Evliyaoĝlu, Y., Çiftçi, U. & Bozdemir, N. Spermatozoa selection by the swim-up procedure and two-layer percoll gradient centrifugation. International Urology and Nephrology 28, 409–418 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550505

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550505

Keywords

Navigation