Abstract
This case report highlights the importance of considering testicular pathology in the differential diagnosis of abdominal pain, and presents an, unusual complication of vasectomy. The need for histological confirmation of the resected specimens, is also stressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lipshutz, L. I., Benson, G. S.: Vasectomy 1980 in Urologic Clinics North America.Urol. Clin. North Am., 7, 1 (1980).
Kaplan, K. A., Huether, C. A.: A clinical study of vasectomy failure and recanalisation.J. Urol., 113, 71 (1975).
Leader, A. J., Axgrao, S. D., Frankowski, R., Mumford, S. D.: Complications of 2711 vasectomies.J. Urol., 111, 365 (1974).
Esho, J. O., Cass, A. S., Irgland, G. W.: Morbidity associated with vasectomy.J. Urol., 110, 413 (1973).
Livingston, E. S.: Vasectomy—A review of 3200 operations.Can. Med. Assoc. J., 105, 1065, (1971).
Watts G. T.: Vasectomy.Br. Med. J., 4, 620 (1970).
Coetze, T.: Double vas deferens: a case report.Br. J. Urol., 31, 336 (1959).
Tuffill, S. F.: Personal communication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ng, P.C.H. Pseudo-appendicitis presenting after vasectomy. International Urology and Nephrology 19, 215–216 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550475
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550475