Skip to main content
Log in

Microscopic estimation of bacteria and cells in urine

II. A clinical study on the application of the theoretical considerations to clinical practice

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improved technique for diagnosing acute urinary tract infections (UTI) by means of microscopic estimation of bacteria, leucocytes, erythrocytes and epithelial cells in urine was tested clinically in a total of 1,807 samples obtained from hospital departments. Marked bacteriuria (≧105 bacteria per ml of urine) was found microscopically in 13.1% of the urines. Of these 1.9% were falsely positive. Altogether 3.5% of the samples were falsely negative. When the sample collection was controlled carefully and detailed information on possible collection errors was given regularly, sensitivity and specificity indices of the microscopic technique were 85.3 and 98.1, respectively. Microscopic finding of cocci, e.g. Enterococci andStr. agalactiae, was more difficult than that of rods. Alongside bacteriuria, finding of leucocytes (>5 leucocytes per microscopic field) was of great importance for UTI diagnostics, and it strengthened further the microscopic diagnosis, while erythrocytes and epithelial cells were of very poor significance for UTI diagnosis. The results show that the microscopic technique described here is a reliable and suitable method for UTI diagnostics in routine clinical laboratories which examine daily large numbers of samples, most of them negative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cruickshank, J. G., Grawler, A. H. L., Hart, R. J. C.: Costs of unnecessary tests: nonsense urines.Br. Med. J., 7, 1355 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilson, G. R. F.: A disposable counting chamber for urinary cytology.J. Clin. Pathol., 17, 571 (1964).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Räisänen, S. A., Merilä, M., Ylitalo, P. Pohja, P.: Microscopic estimation of bacteria and cells in urine. I. Theoretical considerations.Int. Urol. Nephrol. (submitted).

  4. Duerden, B. I., Moyes, A.: Comparison of laboratory methods in diagnosis of urinary tract infection.J. Clin. Pathol., 29, 286 (1976).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jokipii, A. M., Jokipii, L.: Recognition of group B streptococci in dip-slide cultures of urine.J. Clin. Microbiol., 10, 218 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Palmer, D. F., Cavallaro, J. J.: Some concepts of quality control in immunology. In: N. R. Rose and H. Friedman (eds): Manual of Clinical Immunology. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, D. C. 1976, pp. 908–910.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, G. S., Miles, A.: Topley and Wilson's Principles of Bacteriology,Virology and Immunity. Edward Arnold Publishers 1975, pp. 24–25.

  8. Ghosh, H. K.: Role of bacterial growth inhibitors in urine in diagnostic culture.J. Clin. Pathol., 23, 627 (1970).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Merilä, M., Räisänen, S., Ylitalo, P. et al. Microscopic estimation of bacteria and cells in urine. International Urology and Nephrology 19, 109–113 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550459

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550459

Keywords

Navigation