Skip to main content
Log in

Three interpretations of the violation of Bell's inequalities

  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper consists of two parts. Firstly, we shall clarify the connections existing between Clauser-Horne's inequalities and the conditions established by Pitowsky expressing the Kolmogorovian nature of a probability vector. We shall discuss afterwards three possible interpretations of the experimental violation of these inequalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Aerts, “The description of separated systems in quantum mechanics and a possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics,” inMicrophysical Reality and Quantum Formalism, A. van der Merwe et al., eds., (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Aerts and J. Reignier, “The Stern-Gerlach effect revisited,” preprinted VUB/TENA/89/08.

  3. A. Aspect, P. Dalibard, and G. Roger, “Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell's theorem,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. J. S. Bell, “On the EPR paradox,”Physics 1, 195 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory, (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  6. D. Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of quantum theory in terms of hidden variables,”Phys. Rev.,85, 166 (1952).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Clauser and M. A. Horne, “Experimental consequences of objective local theories,”Phys. Rev. D 10, 526 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Dewndney, P. R. Holland, A. Kyprianidis, and J. P. Vigier “Spin and nonlocality in quantum mechanics,”Nature 336, 53–544 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Durt, Doctoral thesis in preparation, to be published in 1996.

  10. D. Home and F. Selleri, “Bell's theorem and the EPR paradox,”Nuovo Cimento 14, 1–96 (1991).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. I. Pitowsky, “Resolution of the EPR and Bell paradoxes,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1299 (1982).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. I. Pitowsky,Quantum Probability, Quantum Logic, Springer, New York, 1989).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. L. Szabo, “On the real meaning of Bell's theorem,”J. Theor. Phys. 33, 191 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. L. Szabo, “Is quantum mechanics compatible with a deterministic universe? Two interpretations of quantum probabilities,”Found. Phys. Lett. 8, 421 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Zeilinger, “Testing Bell's inequalities with periodic switching,”Phys. Lett. A 118, 1 (1986).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by the Federale Diensten voor Wet., Techn. en Cult. Aang. in the framework of IUAP-III no 9.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Durt, T. Three interpretations of the violation of Bell's inequalities. Found Phys 27, 415–434 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550164

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02550164

Keywords

Navigation