The microscopy of the liquid crystalline neat and middle phases of soaps and synthetic detergents
- 495 Downloads
The mesomorphic or “liquid crystalline” neat and middle phases encountered in aqueous systems of soaps and synthetic detergents differ considerably in plasticity. Nevertheless, in fundamental phase studies or the examination of commercial products and processes, identification of these two phases has hitherto been uncertain, particularly when they are mixed with each other or with other phases; even under the polarizing microscope, their identification has not been positive since, by the classical criteria for identifying mesomorphic phases, both are “smectic.”
The present work reveals additional criteria by which the two phases may be satisfactorily distinguished. In the first place, there are non-geometric textures exhibited by middle but not by neat. Conversely, there are planar textures exhibited by neat but not by middle. Furthermore there are important systematic differences even among the focal conic textures upon which the smectic nature of the two phases has previously been predicated.
While the microscopic method now makes possible the identification of phase mixtures, it serves also as a rapid method even where one-phase compositions are concerned.
This study is primarily descriptive in its present state of development, but the existence of systematic microscopic differences between these two nominally smectic phases, coupled with their well-known and pronounced difference in consistency, suggests a fundamental structural distinction between them.
Much of the present subject-matter applies also to such materials as certain wetting agents and dyes, as well as phosphatides and certain other biological substances.
KeywordsSynthetic Detergent Middle Phase Positive Unit Neat Soap Potassium Oleate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Bernal, J. D., and Crowfoot, D., Trans. Faraday Soc.,29, 1042–3 (1933).Google Scholar
- 3.Bragg, W. H., Proc. Roy. Inst. Gt. Brit.,28, 57–93 (1934); see Plates I, II.Google Scholar
- 4.Bragg, W. H.,ibid., Plates I and II, Figures 6, 7 and 8.Google Scholar
- 5.Cameron, J.,Soaps and Candles, p. 102, Blakiston, Phila. (1888).Google Scholar
- 10.Ferguson, R. H.,et al., unpublished work in this laboratory, beginning 1932.Google Scholar
- 12.Friedel, G., Ann. de physique,18, 300–304 (1922); see Plates 4 and 5 at end of volume. (More briefly in Ref. 16.)Google Scholar
- 13.Friedel, G.,ibid., 304–327; see Plates 6–10, 14, 16 at end of volume. Friedel terms a region based on a single ellipse and its corresponding hyperbola a “focal domain.”Google Scholar
- 14.Friedel, G.,ibid., 324–7; also Plates 11 and 18.Google Scholar
- 15.Friedel, G.,ibid., 328 ff.Google Scholar
- 16.Friedel, G., in Alexander’sColloid Chemistry, vol. I, pp. 107–8, Chem. Catalog Co., N. Y. (1926).Google Scholar
- 17.Friedel, G.,ibid.. Planar areas with sheets not parallel to the surface of the preparation, being derived ordinarily from sizeable single crystals, are rare in soaps.Google Scholar
- 18.Friedel, G., Z. Krist.,79, 9 (1931).Google Scholar
- 19.Hartshorne, N. H., and Stuart, A.,Crystals and the Polarizing Microscope, 2nd ed., Arnold, London (1950), chap. IX, espec. pp. 331–41.Google Scholar
- 20.Hermann, C., Z. Krist.,79, 186–221 (1931).Google Scholar
- 22.Lascaray, L., in Hefter-Schönfeld,Fette u. Fettprodukte, vol. IV, pp. 122, 125–7, 179 ff., Springer, Vienna (1939).Google Scholar
- 23.Lascaray, L.,ibid., pp. 122, 125.Google Scholar
- 24.Lascaray, L.,ibid., pp. 125, 181.Google Scholar
- 26.Lehmann, O.,Flüssige Kristalle, Engelmann, Leipzig (1904): Photogr. 6 of Plate 1, Photogr. 1 of Plate 2.Google Scholar
- 27.Lehmann, O., ibid., Photogr. 6 and 7 of Plate 9.Google Scholar
- 28.Lehmann, O., ibid., Plates 3–5.Google Scholar
- 29.Lehman, O., Z physik., Chem.,4, 462–72 (1889).Google Scholar
- 31.Lewkowitsch, J.,Chem. Technol. ... Oils, Fats and Waxes, 5th ed., vol. III, Macmillan, London (1915), p. 304.Google Scholar
- 35.McBain, J. W., Proc. Roy. Inst. Gt. Brit.,1925, 579–84, Figure 2: 3 Nw (42%) potassium laurate.Google Scholar
- 36.McBain, J. W., in Alexander’sColloid Chemistry, vol. I, pp. 137–64, Chem. Catalog Co., N. Y. (1926).Google Scholar
- 40.McBain, J. W., and Elford, W. J., J. Chem. Soc.,1926, 421–38.Google Scholar
- 41.McBain, J. W., and Elford, W. J.,ibid., Photographs I and III: 9 Nw (74%) and 25 Nw (89%) potassium oleate in water. These two photographs, along with a statement that 4 Nw (56%) potassium oleate separates from isotropic liquid at 240°C. as “batonnets,” appear to constitute the total original evidence for the smectic nature of neat soap.Google Scholar
- 43.McBain, J. W., and Langdon, G. M., J. Chem. Soc.,1925, 852–70.Google Scholar
- 44.McBain, J. W., Lazarus, L. H., and Pitter, A. V., Z. physik. Chem.,A147, 87–117 (1930).Google Scholar
- 52.Rosevear, F. B., Am. Mineral.,32, 693–4 (1947).Google Scholar
- 58.Vold, R. D., Soap Sanit. Chemicals,16, 31–37 (1940).Google Scholar
- 63.Vold, R. D., and Vold, M. J., in Alexander’sColloid Chemistry, vol. V, pp. 266–80, espec. Figure 5, Reinhold Publ. Corp., N. Y. (1944).Google Scholar