Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of oxidative stability of high- and normal-oleic peanut oils

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

A peanut breeding line with high-oleic acid and an isogenic sister line with normal fatty acid composition were obtained. Oil was extracted with dichloromethane and processed in the laboratory by alkali neutralization and bleaching. Fatty acid compositions were determined by gas chromatography and application of theoretical response factors. Oils were extracted and processed in duplicate. The oxidative stability of the oils was measured by the Schall oven test (80°C), active oxygen method (AOM) (112°C) and by comparison of oxidation rates on thin-layer chromatography-flame ionization detector (TLC-FID) rods (100°C). Fatty acid analysis indicated that the high-oleic line had 75.6 and 4.7% oleic and linoleic acids, respectively, compared to 56.1 and 24.2% for the normal line. The induction times for the Schall test were 682 and 47 h for high- and normal-oleic oils (P<0.01). The AOM induction times were 69 and 7.3 h for high and normal oils, respectively (P<0.01). The times to reach 50% loss in triglyceride area on TLC-FID were 847 and 247 min for high-oleic compared to normal-oleic oils (P<0.01). The results indicate that high-oleic peanut oil has much greater autoxidation stability as compared to normal oil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Prévôt, A., J.L. Perrin, G. Laclaverie, P. Auge and J.L. Coustille,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 67:161 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hammond, E.G., and W. Fehr, Ibid.1713 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hammond, E.G. inIntroduction to Fats and Oils Technology, edited by P.J. Wan, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1991, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Holaday, C.E., and J.L. Pearson,J. Food Sci. 39:1206 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mercer, L.C., J.C. Wynne and C.T. Young,Peanut Sci. 17:17 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stalker, H.T., C.T. Young and T.M. Jones,Oléagineaux 44:419 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Treadwell, K., C.T. Young and J.C. Wynne, Ibid.381 (1983).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed, E., and C. Young, inPeanut Science and Technology, edited by H. Pattee, and C. Young, American Peanut Research and Education Society, Yoakum, 1982, pp. 655–688.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Branch, W.D., T. Nakayama and M.S. Chinnan,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 67:591 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore, K.M., and D.A. Knauft,J. Heredity 80:252 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Norden, A.J., D.W. Gorbet, D.A. Knauft and C.T. Young,Peanut Sci. 14:7 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Worthington, R.E.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 54:167 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, S.S., inIntroduction to Fats and Oils Technology, edited by P.J. Wan, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1991, pp. 211–231.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, H.-R., and P.J. White,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 69:533 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Warner, K., E.N. Frankel and T.L. Mounts, Ibid.558 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anonymous,Food Marketing and Technology 6:20 (1992).

  17. Paquot, C. (ed.),Standard Methods for the Analysis of Oils, Fats and Derivatives, Part 1, 6th edn., Pergamon Press, New York, Method 2.201.

  18. Morrison, W.R., and L.M. Smith,J. Lipid Res. 5:600 (1964).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ackman, R.G., inAnalysis of Oils and Fats, edited by R.J. Hamilton, and J.B. Rossel, Elsevier Applied Science, New York, 1986, pp. 137–206.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ackman, R.G., and J.C. Sipos,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 65:377 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Craske, J.D., and C.D. Bannon, Ibid.1190 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walker, R.O. (ed.),Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1989, Method Cd 8–53.

    Google Scholar 

  23. deMan, J.M., F. Tie and L. deMan,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 64:993 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sébédio, J.-L., P.O. Astorg, C. Septier and A. Grandgirard,J. Chromatogr. 405:371 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Villota, R., and J.G. Hawkes, inHandbook of Food Engineering, edited by D.R. Heldman, and D.B. Lund, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992, pp. 39–144.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Snyder, J.M., E.N. Frankel and E. Selke,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:1675 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Warner, K., E.N. Frankel and K.J. Moulton, Ibid.386 (1988).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tautorus, C.L., and A.R. McCurdy, Ibid.525 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Frankel, E.N., E. Selke, W.E. Neff and K. Miyashita,Lipids 27:442 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

O’Keefe, S.F., Wiley, V.A. & Knauft, D.A. Comparison of oxidative stability of high- and normal-oleic peanut oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 70, 489–492 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542581

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542581

Key words

Navigation