Characteristics and composition of melon and grape seed oils and cakes

  • Basil S. Kamel
  • H. Dawson
  • Y. Kakuda


Watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris) and grape (Vitis vinifera) seeds were investigated for their nutritional quality and oil characteristics. The yields of seeds on an as is basis (edible portion) were 1.6 and 1.8% for grape and melon, respectively. The melonseed on a dry weight basis consisted of 53.6% testa and 46.4% kernel. The crude protein, fat and fiber content were 16.4, 23.1 and 47.7% for melon and 8.2, 14.0 and 38.6% for grape (dry weight basis). Both seeds were found to contain significant levels of Ca, Mg, P and K. The fatty acid profiles showed an unsaturated fatty acid content of 76.1% for melonseed oil and 88.6% for grapeseed oil. The predominant fatty acid in both seeds was linoleic acid. The iodine value, saponification number and acid value were 116, 248 and 0.97 for melonseed oil and 132, 194 and 1.59 for grapeseed oil. The amino acid profiles of both seed cake proteins were determined and compared with hen’s egg protein.


Lecithin Melon Grape Seed Amino Acid Profile Soybean Lecithin 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Amerine, M.A., H.W. Berg and W.V. Cruess, The Technology of Winemaking. 2nd ed. AVI Pub. Co., Westport, Connecticut (1968).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rice, A.C., Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 27:21 (1976).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fantozzi, P., and A.A. Betschart, JAOCS 56:457 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Girgis, P., and F. Said, J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 19:615 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis, 12th ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kamel, B.S., J. Food Quality 5:139 (1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Folch, J., M. Lees and G. Stanley, J. Biol. Chem. 226:497 (1957).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shehata, A.Y., J.M. deMan and G.C. Alexander, Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 3:85 (1970).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Official and Tentative Methods of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, AOCS, 3rd ed., AOCS, Champaign, IL (1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fazio, G., V. Cilluffo, M.C. Indovina and L. Pirrone, Riv. Soc. Ital. Sci. Aliment. 11:349 (1982).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oyenuga, V.A., and B.L. Fetuga, J. Sci. Fd. Agric. 26:843 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Castriotta, G., and M. Canella, J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:763 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Corrao, A., JAOCS 56:460 (1979).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gattuso, A.M., G. Fazio and V. Cilluffo, Riv. Soc. Ital. Sci. Aliment. 12:47 (1983).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mattick, L.R., and A.C. Rice, Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 27:88 (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kinsella, J.E., Food Technol. 28:58 (1974).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chowdhury, D.K., M.M. Chakrabarty and B.K. Mukherji, JAOCS 32:384 (1955).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Earle, F.R., E.H. Melvin, L.H. Mason, C.H. VanEtten and I.A. Wolff, Ibid. 36:304 (1959).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kwolek, W.F., and C.H. VanEtten, J. Agr. Food Chem. 16:496 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    VanEtten, C.H., W.F. Kwolek, J.E. Peters and A.S. Barclay, Ibid. 15:1077 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    VanEtten, C.H., R.W. Miller, I.A. Wolff and Q. Jones, Ibid. 11:399 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© AOCS Press 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basil S. Kamel
    • 1
  • H. Dawson
    • 1
  • Y. Kakuda
    • 2
  1. 1.Atkemix Inc.BrantfordCanada
  2. 2.Department of Food ScienceUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada

Personalised recommendations