Skip to main content

Effect of natural antioxidants in virgin olive oil on oxidative stability of refined, bleached, and deodorized olive oil

Abstract

The factors influencing the oxidative stability of different commercial olive oils were evaluated. Comparisons were made of (i) the oxidative stability of commercial olive oils with that of a refined, bleached, and deodorized (RBD) olive oil, and (ii) the antioxidant activity of a mixture of phenolic compounds extracted from virgin olive oil with that of pure compounds andα-tocopherol added to RBD olive oil. The progress of oxidation at 60°C was followed by measuring both the formation (peroxide value, PV) and the decomposition (hexanal and volatiles) of hydroperoxides. The trends in antioxidant activity were different according to whether PV or hexanal were measured. Although the virgin olive oils contained higher levels of phenolic compounds than did the refined and RBD oils, their oxidative stability was significantly decreased by their high initial PV. Phenolic compounds extracted from virgin olive oils increased the oxidative stability of RBD olive oil. On the basis of PV, the phenol extract had the best antioxidant activity at 50 ppm, as gallic acid equivalents, but on the basis of hexanal formation, better antioxidant activity was observed at 100 and 200 ppm.α-Tocopherol behaved as a prooxidant at high concentrations (>250 ppm) on the basis of PV, but was more effective than the other antioxidants in inhibiting hexanal formation in RBD olive oil.o-Diphenols (caffeic acid) and, to a lesser extent, substitutedo-diphenols (ferulic and vanillic acids), showed better antioxidant activity than monophenols (p- ando-coumaric), based on both PV and hexanal formation. This study emphasizes the need to measure at least two oxidation parameters to better evaluate antioxidants and the oxidative stability of olive oils. The antioxidant effectiveness of phenolic compounds in virgin olive oils can be significantly diminished in oils if their initial PV are too high.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Perrin, J.L.,Rev. Franc. Corps Gras 39:25 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Forcadell, M.Ll., M. Comas, X. Miquel and M.C. de la Torre Ibid.:547 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nergiz, C., and K. Ünal,J. Sci. Food Agric. 56:79 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vázquez-Roncero, A., C. Janer del Valle and M.L. Janer del Valle,Grasas y Aceites 24:350 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gutfinger, T.,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 58:966 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Solinas, M.,Riv. Ital. Sost. Grasse LXIV:255 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brenes, M., P. García, M.C. Durán and A. Garrido,J. Food Sci. 58:347 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montedoro, G., M. Servili, M. Baldioli and E. Miniati,J. Agric. Food Chem. 40:1577 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frankel, E.N.,Prog. Lipid Res. 22:1 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Frankel, E.N.,Trends Food Sci. & Technol. 4:220 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Slinkard, K., and V.L. Singleton,Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 28:49 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Handelman, G.J., L.J. Machlin, K. Fitch, J.J. Weiter and E.A. Dratz,J. Nutr. 115:807 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Christie, W.W.,Lipid Analysis, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1973, p. 89.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chapman, R.H., and J. McKay,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 26:360 (1949).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Steel, R.G.D., and J.H. Torrie,Principles and Procedures of Statistics, 2nd edn., Mc Graw Hill, New York, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frankel, E.N., W.E. Neff and E. Selke,Lipids 16:279 (1981).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Holman, R.T., and O.C. Elmer,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 24:127 (1947).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang, S-W, E.N. Frankel and J.B. German,J. Agric. Food Chem. 42:2108 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsimidou, M., G. Papadopoulos and D. Boskou,Food Chem. 44:53 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gutiérrez, R., C. Janer del Valle, M.L. Janer del Valle, F. Gutiérrez and A. Vázquez,Grasas y Aceites 24:101 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ingold, K.U.,Chem. Rev. 6:563 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahoney, L.R.,Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 8:545 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Papadopoulos, G., and D. Boskou,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:669 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jung, M.Y., and D.B. Min,Food Chem. 45:183 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cillard, J., and P. Cillard,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 57:39 (1980).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Frankel, E.N., Ibid.:767 (1993).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Satue, M.T., Huang, SW. & Frankel, E.N. Effect of natural antioxidants in virgin olive oil on oxidative stability of refined, bleached, and deodorized olive oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 72, 1131–1137 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540978

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540978

Key words

  • Antioxidants
  • hexanal
  • hydroperoxide decomposition
  • hydroperoxide formation
  • olive oil
  • oxidative stability
  • peroxide value
  • phenolic compounds
  • tocopherols