Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative studies of bacterial chemotaxis and microbial population dynamics

  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there is a long history of conjecture regarding the role and significance of bacterial chemotaxis in microbial ecology, only recently has a significant body of work appeared attempting to address this issue. The purpose of this paper is to provide a concise overview of this work, which combined mathematical modeling of bacterial population migration and experimental measurement of the model parameters with modeling of competitive microbial population dynamics in a nonmixed environment. Predictions from the population dynamics models, based on experimental estimates of the various motility and growth parameter values, are related to the small number of experimental observations available to date dealing with the effects of bacterial motility on competition in a nonmixed environment. Current results indicate that cell motility and chemotaxis properties can be as important to population dynamics as cell growth kinetic properties, so that greater attention to this aspect of microbial behavior is warranted in future studies of microbial ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler J (1973) A method for measuring chemotaxis and use of the method to determine optimum conditions for chemotaxis byEscherichia coli. J Gen Microbiol 74:77–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Adler J (1975) Chemotaxis in bacteria. Ann Rev Biochem 44:341–356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg HC (1988) A physicist looks at bacterial chemotaxis. Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol 53:1–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg HC, Brown DA (1972) Chemotaxis inEscherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking. Nature 239:500–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berg HC, Purcell EM (1977) Physics of chemoreception. Biophys J 20:193–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Block SM, Segall JE, Berg HC (1983) Adaptation kinetics in bacterial chemotaxis. J Bacteriol 154:312–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Borkovich KA, Simon MI (1990) The dynamics of protein phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 63:1339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boyce JR, Miller RV (1982) Motility as a selective force in the reversion of cystic fibrosis-associated mucoidPseudomonas aeruginosa to the nonmucoid phenotype in culture. Infect Immun 37:840–844

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown DA, Berg HC (1974) Temporal stimulation of chemotaxis inEscherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:1388–1392

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ford RM, Phillips BR, Quinn JA, Lauffenburger D (1991) Stopped-flow chamber and image analysis sytem for quantitative characterization of bacterial population migration: Motility and chemotaxis ofEscherichia coli K12 to fucose. Microb Ecol 22:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freter R, O'Brien PCM, Halstead SA (1978) Adhesion and chemotaxis as determinants of bacterial association with mucosal surfaces. Adv Exp Med Biol 107:429–437

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Holz M, Chen S (1979) Spatio-temporal structure of migrating chemotactic band ofEscherichia coli. I. Traveling band profile. Biophys J 26:243–262

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Keller EFF, Segel LA (1971) Model for chemotaxis. J Theor Biol 30:225–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kelly FX, Dapsis K, Lauffenburger D (1988) Effects of bacterial chemotaxis on dynamics of microbial competition. Microb Ecol 16:115–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelman A, Hruschka J (1973) The role of motility and aerotaxis in the selective increase of avirulent bacteria in still broth cultures ofPseudomonas solanacearum. J Gen Microbiol 76:177–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kennedy MJ, Lawless JG (1985) Role of chemotaxis in the ecology of dentrifiers. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:109–114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Koshland DE Jr (1980) Bacterial chemotaxis as a model behavioral system. Distinguished lecture series of the Society of General Physiologists, vol. 2, Raven Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lauffenburger D, Aris R, Keller KH (1981) Effects of random motility on growth of bacterial populations. Microb Ecol 7:207–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lauffenburger D, Aris R, Keller KH (1982) Effects of cell motility and chemotaxis on microbial population growth. Biophys J 40:209–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lauffenburger D, Calcagno B (1983) Competition between two microbial populations in a non-mixed environment: Effect of cell random motility. Biotech Bioeng 25:2103–2125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lauffenburger D, Kennedy CR, Aris R (1984) Traveling bands of chemotactic bacteria in the context of population growth. Bull Math Biol 46:19–40

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lauffenburger DA, Rivero M, Kelly F, Ford R, DiRienzo J (1987) Bacterial chemotaxis: Cell flux model, parameter measurement, population dynamics, and genetic manipulation. Ann NY Acad Sci 506:281–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Macnab RM (1980) Sensing the environment: Bacterial chemotaxis. In: Goldberger R (ed) Biological regulation and development, vol. 2. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 337–412

    Google Scholar 

  24. Macnab RM (1987) Motility and chemotaxis. In: Neidhardt FC (ed)Escherichia coli andSalmonella typhimurium: Cellular and molecular biology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 732–759

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mcnab RM, Koshland DE Jr (1972) The gradient-sensing mechanism in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69:2509–2512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Old DC, Duguid JP (1970) Selective outgrowth of fimbriate bacteria in static liquid medium. J Bacteriol 103:447–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ordal GW (1985) Bacterial chemotaxis: Biochemistry of behavior in a single cell. Crit Rev Microbiol 12:95–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Parkinson JS (1988) Protein phosphorylation in bacterial chemotaxis. Cell 53:1–2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pilgrim WR, Williams FD (1976) Survival value of chemotaxis in mixed cultures. Can J Microbiol 22:1771–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rivero M, Lauffenburger D (1986) Quantification of bacterial chemotaxis by measurement of model parameters using the capillary assay. Biotechnol Bioeng 28:1178–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rivero M, Tranquillo R, Buettner H, Lauffenburger D (1989) Transport models for chemotactic cell populations based on individual cell behavior. Chem Eng Sci 44:2881–2897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Segel LA (1977) A theoretical study of receptor mechanisms in bacterial chemotaxis. Siam J Appl Math 32:653–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Segel LA, Jackson J (1973) Theoretical analysis of chemotactic movement in bacteria. J Mech Cell Motility 2:25–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Smith JL, Doetsch RN (1969) Studies on negative chemotaxis and the survival value of motility inPseudomonas fluorescens. J Gen Microbiol 55:379–391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Spudich J, Koshland DE Jr (1975) Quantitation of the sensory response in bacterial chemotaxis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:710–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Staffeld PO, Quinn JA, Lauffenburger D (1988) Analysis of cell transport phenomena: Bacterial chemotaxis in the capillary assay. Chem Eng Comm 58:339–351

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stock J, Stock AM (1987) What is the role of receptor methylation in bacterial chemotaxis? Trends Biochem Sci 12:371–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vicker MG (1981) Ideal and non-ideal concentration gradient propagation in chemotaxis studies. Exp Cell Res 136:91–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois, 61801, Urbana, Illinois, USA

    Douglas A. Lauffenburger

Authors
  1. Douglas A. Lauffenburger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauffenburger, D.A. Quantitative studies of bacterial chemotaxis and microbial population dynamics. Microb Ecol 22, 175–185 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540222

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02540222

Keywords

Search

Navigation